1. National Center for Health Statistics. Discharges with at least one procedure in nonfederal short-stay hospitals, by sex, age, and selected procedures: United States, selected years 1990 through 2009-2010. Table 90. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/contents2014.htm#090
. Accessed July 30, 2018.
2. Edozien LC. Hysterectomy for benign conditions: patients and doctors will benefit from evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2005;330:1457-1458.
3. Corona LE, Swenson CW, Sheetz KH, et al. Use of other treatments before hysterectomy for benign conditions in a statewide hospital collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:304.e1-304.e7.
4. Lawson EH, Gibbons MM, Ingraham AM, et al. Appropriateness criteria to assess variations in surgical procedure use in the United States. Arch Surg 2011;146:1433-1440.
5. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A. Small area variations in health care delivery. Science 1973;182:1102-1108.
6. Arndt M, Bradbury RC, Golec J. Indications for hysterectomy: variation within and across hospitals. Med Care Res Rev 1995;52:342-363.
7. Carlisle DM, Valdez RB, Shapiro MF, et al. Geographic variation in rates of selected surgical procedures within Los Angeles County. Health Serv Res 1995;30:27-42.
8. Haas S, Acker D, Donahue C, et al. Variation in hysterectomy rates across small geographic areas of Massachusetts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:150-154.
9. McPherson K, Strong PM, Epstein A, et al. Regional variations in the use of common surgical procedures: Within and between England and Wales, Canada and the United States of America. Soc Sci Med A 1981;15(3 Part 1):273-288.
10. McPherson K, Wennberg JE, Hovind OB, et al. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med 1982;307:1310-1314.
11. Palmer JR, Rao RS, Adams-Campbell LL, et al. Correlates of hysterectomy among African-American women. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:1309-1315.
12. Paul-Shaheen P, Clark JD, Williams D. Small area analysis: a review and analysis of the North American literature. J Health Polit Policy Law 1987;12:741-809.
13. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am 1982;246:120-134.
14. Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:34.e1-34.e7.
15. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, et al. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1091-1095.
16. Geller SE, Burns LR, Brailer DJ. The impact of nonclinical factors on practice variations: the case of hysterectomies. Health Serv Res 1996;30:729-750.
17. Schoen J. Between choice and coercion: women and the politics of sterilization in North Carolina, 1929-1975. J Womens Hist 2001;13:132-156.
18. Price GN, Darity WA, Jr. The economics of race and eugenic sterilization in North Carolina: 1958-1968. Econ Hum Biol 2010;8:261-272.
19. Rosner B, Colditz GA. Age at menopause: imputing age at menopause for women with a hysterectomy with application to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol 2011;21:450-460.
20. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. U.S. population data-1969-2016. www.seer.cancer.gov/popdata
. Published December 2017. Accessed July 30, 2018.
24. Anselin L, Bera AK, Florax R, et al. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 1996;26:77-104.
25. Erekson EA, Weitzen S, Sung VW, et al. Socioeconomic indicators and hysterectomy status in the United States, 2004. J Reprod Med 2009;54:553-558.
26. Harlow BL, Barbieri RL. Influence of education on risk of hysterectomy before age 45 years. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:843-847.
27. Kjerulff K, Langenberg P, Guzinski G. The socioeconomic correlates of hysterectomies in the United States. Am J Public Health 1993;83:106-108.
28. Richter DL, Kenzig MJ, Greaney ML, et al. Physician-patient interaction and hysterectomy decision making: the ENDOW study. Ethnicity, Needs, and Decisions of Women. Am J Health Behav 2002;26:431-441.
29. Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Ann Surg 2006;243:241-249.
30. Quon BS, Psoter K, Mayer-Hamblett N, et al. Disparities in access to lung transplantation for patients with cystic fibrosis by socioeconomic status. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;186:1008-1013.
31. Schwartz A, Schiano T, Kim-Schluger L, et al. Geographic disparity: the dilemma of lower socioeconomic status, multiple listing, and death on the liver transplant waiting list. Clin Transplant 2014;28:1075-1079.
32. Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J, Mosher W. Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr086.pdf
. Published November 10, 2015. Accessed November 8, 2016.
33. Jamison PM, Noone AM, Ries LA, et al. Trends in endometrial cancer incidence by race and histology with a correction for the prevalence of hysterectomy, SEER 1992 to 2008. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013;22:233-241.
34. Kwan M-P. The uncertain geographic context problem. Ann Assoc Am Geographers 2012;102:958-968.
35. Cummins S, Curtis S, Diez-Roux AV, et al. Understanding and representing ‘’ in health research: a relational approach. Soc Sci Med 2007;65:1825-1838.
36. Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Scammon DL, Waitzman NJ, et al. Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med 2013;11(suppl 1):S115-S123.