Original Article

Development of a Flipped Medical School Dermatology Module

Authors: Joshua Fox, MD, David Faber, BA, Solomon Pikarsky, BS, Chi Zhang, PhD, Richard Riley, MD, PhD, Alex Mechaber, MD, Mark O’Connell, MD, Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD

Abstract

Objectives: The flipped classroom module incorporates independent study in advance of in-class instructional sessions. It is unproven whether this methodology is effective within a medical school second-year organ system module. We report the development, implementation, and effectiveness of the flipped classroom methodology in a second-year medical student dermatology module at the University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine.

Methods: In a retrospective cohort analysis, we compared attitudinal survey data and mean scores for a 50-item multiple-choice final examination of the second-year medical students who participated in this 1-week flipped course with those of the previous year’s traditional, lecture-based course.

Results: Each group comprised nearly 200 students. Students’ age, sex, Medical College Admission Test scores, and undergraduate grade point averages were comparable between the flipped and traditional classroom students. The flipped module students’ mean final examination score of 92.71% ± 5.03% was greater than that of the traditional module students’ 90.92% ± 5.51% (P < 0.001) score. Three of the five most commonly missed questions were identical between the two cohorts. The majority of students preferred the flipped methodology to attending live lectures or watching previously recorded lectures.

Conclusions: The flipped classroom can be an effective instructional methodology for a medical school second-year organ system module.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first.

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view your purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($15)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Prober CG, Khan S. Medical education reimagined: a call to action. Acad Med 2013;88:1407-1410.
 
2. Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, et al. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e2.
 
3. McLean S, Attardi SM, Faden L, et al. Flipped classrooms and student learning: not just surface gains. Adv Physiol Educ 2016;40:47-55.
 
4. Mortensen CJ, Nicholson AM. The flipped classroom stimulates greater learning and is a modern 21st century approach to teaching today' undergraduates. J Anim Sci 2015;93:3722-3731.
 
5. Belfi LM, Bartolotta RJ, Giambrone AE, et al. "Flipping" the introductory clerkship in radiology: impact on medical student performance and perceptions. Acad Radiol 2015;22:794-801.
 
6. Morgan H, Marzano D, Lanham M, et al. Preparing medical students for obstetrics and gynecology milestone level one: a description of a pilot curriculum. Med Educ Online 2014;19:25746.
 
7. Gillispie V. Using the flipped classroom to bridge the gap to Generation Y. Ochsner J 2016;16:32-36.
 
8. Khan Academy home page. https://www.khanacademy.org. Accessed February 24, 2017.
 
9. Cane Academy home page. http://dermatology.med.miami.edu/education/cane-academy-dermatology-course. Accessed February 24, 2017.
 
10. Morgan H, McLean K, Chapman C, et al. The flipped classroom for medical students. Clin Teach 2015;12:155-160.