Original Article

Do Interviews Really Matter in Generating Programs and Applicants’ Rank Lists for the Match?

Authors: Christopher Di Felice, MD, Pallavi Sharma, MD, David A. Folt, MD, Rodney J. Folz, MD, Frank Jacono, MD, Shine Raju, MD, Mohammad A. Shatat, MD, Joanne McKell, MD, Anna May MD, Maroun Matta, MD

Abstract

Objective: A paucity of data exists on the role of the interview day in programs and applicants’ final rank list. The objective of our study was to investigate the impact interview day has on our programs and our interviewees’ final rank list.

Methods: For the 2020 appointment year, our program used an Electronic Residency Application System Application Scoring Tool and Interview Scoring Tool to generate the preliminary rank list for our pulmonary and critical care fellowship applicants. The final rank list was decided after interviewers’ discussion during the program’s rank list meeting. We aimed to correlate the preliminary and final lists. We also surveyed applicants on the importance of interview day in generating their rank list.

Results: The final and the preliminary rank lists were strongly correlated (rs(47) = 0.87, P < 0.001). There was a stronger correlation between the final rank and the rank based on the application score (rs(47) = 0.84, P < 0.001) than the rank based on the interview score (rs(47) = 0.64, P < 0.001). For the postinterview survey, 48 applicants were surveyed—20 replied with a response rate of 42% and 18 respondents (90%) rated the interview experience as important or very important in their rank list decisions.

Conclusions: The programs rank list correlated more with the candidates’ written application than their interview day performance; however, interview experience greatly influenced the applicants’ rank lists. In the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, in which all interviews are virtual, programs should make diligent efforts to construct virtual interview days, given their importance to applicants in generating their final rank list for the match.

Full Article

Having trouble viewing the article content below? Click here to open it directly.

Images

Download Image

Download Image

References

1. National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: Specialties Matching Service 2020 appointment year. https://www.nrmp.org/match-data-analytics/ fellowship-data-reports/. Accessed March 10, 2020.
 
2. Bosslet G, Carlos W, Tybor D, et al. Multicenter validation of a customizable scoring tool for selection of trainees for a residency or fellowship program, the EAST-IST study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14:517–523.
 
3. Bosslet G, Burkart K, Miles M, et al. Preparing for fellowship in internal medicine. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015;12:567–573.
 
4. Levashina J, Hartwell C, Morgeson F, et al. The structured employment interview: narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychol 2014;67:241–293.
 
5. Bass A, Wu C, Schaefer JP, et al. In-group bias in residency selection. Med Teach 2013;35:747–751.
 
6. Olson K. Survey participation, nonresponse bias, measurement error bias, and total bias. Public Opin Q 2006;70:737–758.