The Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) is the official, peer-reviewed journal of the Southern Medical Association. It has a multidisciplinary and inter-professional focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists.

SMJ // Article

Original Article

Evaluating the Impact of a Second-Level Observation Unit on Patient Outcomes at a Large Academic Health Center with a Coexisting Type I Observation Unit

Authors: Padageshwar Sunkara, MD, MMCi, Gary E. Rosenthal, MD, Chi-Cheng Huang, MD, Gregory B. Russell, MS, Tareq S. Islam, MD, MPH, William C. Lippert, MD, MPH

Abstract

Background: Observation units (OUs) are a common healthcare delivery model for health systems across the United States. OUs vary from a type I to type IV based on several factors. Another category of OUs—second-level OUs—does not fit this traditional classification due to a different patient population composition and staffing model. The impact of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU has not been previously evaluated. As such, our study assesses the impact of patient outcomes in a second-level OU with a coexisting type I OU.

Methods: We established a second-level OU comprising 14 beds on a medical-surgical floor. Patients designated as observation status who did not meet the criteria for the type I OU in the emergency department were cohorted on this unit and cared for by a multidisciplinary team that included nurses, case managers, pharmacists, and hospital medicine providers. We compared patient outcomes pre- and postsecond-level OU implementation for all observation status patients admitted to hospital medicine between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019.

Results: Patients cohorted on the second-level OU had a shorter length of stay (estimated reduction in 11.7 hours; P < 0.0001) and a lower conversion rate from observation to inpatient status (“admission rate”; 14.5% vs 57.7%; P < 0.0001) in comparison to the nonintervention group; this led to a saving of 506.5 bed-days in comparison to the preimplementation phase.

Conclusions: Implementation of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU led to a reduced length of stay, admission rate, and bed-days saved.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare benefit policy manual. Chapter 6: hospital services covered under Part B. https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/manuals/downloads/bp102c06.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed March 30, 2025.
 
2. Leykum LK, Huerta V, Mortensen E. Implementation of a hospitalist-run observation unit and impact on length of stay (LOS): a brief report. J Hosp Med 2010;5:E2–E5.
 
3. Budde J, Agarwal P, Mazumdar M, Yeo J, Braman SS. Can an emergency department observation unit reduce hospital admissions for COPD exacerbation? Lung 2018;196: 267–270.
 
4. Eeles E, Thompson L, McCrow J, et al. Management of delirium in medicine: experience of a close observation unit. Australas J Ageing 2013;32:60–63.
 
5. Jones T, Russell-Fisher H. Development of a paediatric short-stay observation and assessment unit. Nurs Child Young People 2018;30:20–25.
 
6. Chandra A, Sieck S, Hocker M, et al. An observation unit may help improve an institution’s Press Ganey satisfaction score. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2011;10:104–106.
 
7. Chor WPD, Yong PXL, Lim LL, et al. Management of dyspepsia—the role of the ED observation unit to optimize patient outcomes. Am J Emerg Med 2018;36:1733–1737.
 
8. Baugh CW, Venkatesh AK, Hilton JA, et al. Making greater use of dedicated hospital observation units for many short-stay patients could save $3.1 billion a year. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31:2314–2323.
 
9. Ross MA, Hockenberry JM, Mutter R, et al. Protocol-driven emergency department observation units offer savings, shorter stays, and reduced admissions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:2149–2156. .
 
10. Sunkara PR, Lippert WC, Rosenthal GE, et al. Implementing a second-level observation unit at a large academic medical center. South Med J 2021;114:322–325.
 
11. Osborne AD, Farrah H, Wheatley M, et al. There’s another observation unit?: a case series survey of second level observation units. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2016;15:26–28.
 
12. Pena ME, Fox JM, Southall AC, et al. Effect on efficiency and cost-effectiveness when an observation unit is managed as a closed unit vs an open unit. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31: 1042–1046.
 
13. Page K, Barnett AG, Graves N. What is a hospital bed day worth? A contingent valuation study of hospital chief executive officers. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:137.
 
14. Sandmann FG, Robotham JV, Deeny SR, et al. Estimating the opportunity costs of bed-days. Health Econ 2018;27:592–605.
 
15. Ross MA, Compton S, Medado P, et al. An emergency department diagnostic protocol for patients with transient ischemic attack: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50:109–119.
 
16. Nahab F, Leach G, Kingston C, et al. Impact of an emergency department observation unit transient ischemic attack protocol on length of stay and cost. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 21:673–678.
 
17. Dada RS, Sule AA. Factors affecting length of stay for observation patients. Cureus 2019;11:e4547.