Primary Article

Foibles and Fallacies in the Diagnosis of Arthritis

Authors: LOUIS M. SALES MD

Abstract

The diagnosis of arthritis is usually made on a clinical basis, and laboratory and x-ray aids are only secondary and sometimes misleading tools. Set forth are 11 common fallacies which often mislead the physician in his interpretation of laboratory and x-ray findings in the study of a patient with arthritis. Included are references to the role of x-ray findings, joint fluid and synovial biopsy findings, hyperuricemia, rheumatoid factor, rheumatoid nodules, sedimentation rate, antinuclear antibodies, and other peripheral blood and urinary findings. In most cases, the astute physician should be able to make an accurate diagnosis when he first sees the arthritic patient; in others, any and all of the laboratory and x-ray parameters mentioned, despite their obvious shortcomings, may be of help in leading to a proper diagnosis. In a small percentage of cases, only the passage of time and further observation of the patient will establish the correct diagnosis.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References