Original Article
Gender Differences in Knowledge and Perceptions of HIV Resources Among Individuals Living with HIV in the Southeast
Abstract
Objectives: Ancillary services have been associated with beneficial health utilization outcomes among individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), including greater retention in medical care and greater likelihood of antiretroviral use. Our primary objectives were to examine gender differences in barriers to ancillary services among people living with HIV in the Southeastern United States.
Methods: Survey and chart abstraction data were collected from six tertiary infectious diseases clinics in the Southeast. Using multivariate analyses, we examined the relationship between gender and 1) knowledge of how to access HIV and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) resource information and 2) opinions about the helpfulness of local services for people with HIV/AIDS.
Results: Women were less knowledgeable about HIV/AIDS resources and rated local services less favorably than men. Middle-aged and older African-American women rated local services as less helpful than other survey participants did.
Conclusions: These findings indicate a need for outreach services that are designed to address the specific needs of older African-American women, and women in general.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Cunningham WE, Anderson RM, Katz MH, et al. The impact of competing subsistence needs and barriers on access to medical care for persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus receiving care in the United States. Med Care 1999; 37: 1270–1281.
2. Marx R, Katz M, Park MS, et al. Meeting the service needs of HIV-infected persons: Is the Ryan White CARE Act succeeding? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1997; 14: 44–55.
3. Katz MH, Cunningham WE, Fleishman JA, et al. Effect of case management on unmet needs and utilization of medical care and medications among HIV-infected persons. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135( 8 Pt 1): 557–565.
4. Raevis V, Siegel K, Gorey E. Factors associated with HIV-infected women’s delay in seeking medical care. AIDS Care 1998; 10: 549–562.
5. Conover C, Whetten K. The impact of ancillary services on primary care use and outcomes for HIV/AIDS patients with public insurance coverage. AIDS Care 2002; 14( suppl 1): S59–71.
6. McKinney M. Service needs and networks of rural women with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Patient Care 1998; 12: 471–480.
7. Crystal S, Jackson MM. Psychosocial adaptation and economic circumstances of persons with AIDS and ARC. Fam Community Health 1989; 12: 77–88.
8. Piette JD, Fleishman JA, Stein MD, et al. Perceived needs and unmet needs for formal services among people with HIV disease. J Community Health 1993; 18: 11–23.
9. Butz AM, Hutton N, Joyner M, et al. HIV-infected women and infants: social and health factors impeding utilization of health care. J Nurse Midwifery 1993; 38: 103–109.
10. Weissman G, Melchior L, Huba G, et al. Women living with substance abuse and HIV disease: medical care access issues. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1995; 50: 115–120.
11. Bartlett J: Addressing the challenges of adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2002; 29( suppl 1): S2–S10.
12. Singh N, Squier C. Determinants of compliance with antiretroviral therapy in patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Prospective assessment with implications for enhancing compliance. AIDS Care 1996; 8: 261–269.
13. Angelino AF, Treisman GJ. Management of psychiatric disorders in patients infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 847–856.
14. Shelton D, Marconi K, Pounds MB, et al. Medical adherence among prenatal, HIV seropositive African-American women: Family issues. Fam Syst Med 1993; 11: 343–356.
15. Sankar A, Luborksy M, Schuman P, et al. Adherence discourse among African-American women taking HAART. AIDS Care 2002; 14: 203–218.
16. Sherer R, Stieglitz K, Narra J et al. HIV multidisciplinary teams work: support services improve access to and retention in HIV primary care. AIDS Care 14( suppl 1): S31–44, 2002.
17. Magnus M, Schmidt N, Kirkhart K, et al. Association between ancillary services and clinical and behavioral outcomes among HIV-infected women. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2001; 15: 137–145.
18. Meredith K, Delaney J. A survey of women with HIV about their expectations for care. AIDS Care 1997; 9: 513–522.
19. Siegel K, Karus D. Testing and treatment behaviour of HIV-infected women: White, African-American, Puerto Rican comparisons. AIDS Care 1997; 9: 297–309.
20. Cashetta MB. Clinical manifestations of HIV infection in women. Treatment Issues 1990; 5: 3.
21. Brettle R, Leen C. The natural history of HIV and AIDS in women. AIDS 1991; 5: 1283–1292.
22. Ickovics J, Rodin J. Women and AIDS in the United States. Health Psychol 1992; 11: 1–16.
23. Frank KO, Blundo R, Brabant S. HIV-infected women in Louisiana. AIDS Patient Care 1995; 9: 111–120.
24. Shapiro MF, Morton SC, McCaffrey DF, et al. Variations in the care of HIV-Infected adults in the United States. JAMA 1999; 281: 2305–2315.
25. Smith SR, Kirking DM. Access and use of medications in HIV disease. Health Serv Res 1999; 34: 123–144.
26. Hellinger F. The use of health services by women with HIV Infection. Health Serv Res 1993; 28: 543–562.
27. Anderson KH, Mitchell JM. Differential access in the receipt of antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of AIDS and its implications for survival. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 3114–3120.
28. Ashman JJ, Conviser R, Pounds MB. Associations between HIV-positive individuals’ receipt of ancillary services and medical care receipt and retention. AIDS Care 2002; 14( suppl 1): S109–S118.
29. Seals B, Sowell RL, Demi AS. Falling through the cracks: Social service concerns of women infected with HIV. Qual Health Res 1995; 5: 496–515.
30. Kaiser Family Foundation: HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the southern region of the country: Epidemiological overview 2002; Available athttp://www.kff.org/hivaids/upload/14362_1.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2004.
31. Hader SL, Smith DK, Moore JS, et al. HIV infection in women in the United States: Status at the Millenium. JAMA 2001; 285: 1186–1192.
32. McKinney MM. Variations in rural AIDS epidemiology and service delivery models in the United States. J Rural Health 2002; 18: 455–466.
33. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Supplemental Report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2000; 6:(No. 2): 1–16.
34. Whetten K, Nguyen T, Heald A. Characteristics of individuals infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus and provider interaction in the predominantly rural Southeast. Southern Med J 2001; 94: 212–222.
35. Bozzette SA, Hays RD, Berry SH, et al. Derivation and properties of a brief health status assessment for use in HIV disease. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1995; 8: 253–265.
36. Wu AW, Rubin HR, Mathews WC, et al. A health status questionnaire using 30 items from the medical outcomes study; preliminary validation in person with early HIV infection. Med Care 1991; 29: 786–798.
37. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston, Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1993; 41( RR-17): 1–17.
39. Borooah VK. Logit and Probit: Ordered and multinomial models. Thousand Oaks, Ca, Sage Publications, 2001.
40. Statacorp. Stata reference manual release 6: Volume 2. College Station, TX, Stata Press, 1999.
41. Gujarati DN. Basic Econometrics. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1995.
42. Federal Poverty Guidelines. Federal Register 1997; 62: 10856–10859.
43. Castaneda D. HIV/AIDS-related services for women and the rural community context. AIDS Care 2000; 12: 549–565.
44. Bunting S. Sources of stigma associated with women with HIV. Adv Nurs Sci 1996; 19: 64–73.
45. Shavers V, Lynch C, Burmeister L. Factors that influence African-Americans’ willingness to participate in medical research studies. Cancer 2001; 91( suppl 1): 233–236.
46. Francis C. The medical ethos and social responsibility in medicine. J Natl Med Assoc 2001; 93: 157–168.
47. Blendon RJ, Scheck AC, Donelan K, et al. How Whites and African Americans view their health and social problems: Different experiences, different expectations. JAMA 1995; 273: 341–346.
48. Fongwa M. Overview of themes identified from African American discourse on quality of care. J Nurs Care Qual 2002; 16: 17–38.
49. Shi L, Starfield B. The effect of primary care physician supply and income inequality on mortality among Blacks and Whites in US metropolitan areas. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 1246–1250.
50. Thomas SB, Quinn SC. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: Implications for HIV Education and AIDS risk education programs in the Black community. Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 1498–1505.
51. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas S, Williams M, et al. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 537–546.
