1. Williams MV. Hospitalists and the hospital medicine system of care are good for patient care. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1254–1260.
2. Hauer KE, Wachter RM. Implications of the hospitalist model for medical students’ education. Acad Med 2001;76:324–330.
3. Saint S, Fowler KE, Krein SL, et al. An academic hospitalist model to improve healthcare worker communication and learner education: results from a quasi-experimental study at a Veterans Affairs medical center. JHosp Med 2013;8:702–710.
4. Meltzer D, Manning WG, Morrison J, et al. Effects of a physician experience on costs and outcomes on an academic general medicine service: results of a trial of hospitalists. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:866–874.
5. Lindenauer PK, Rothberg MB, Pekow PS, et al. Outcomes of care by hospitalists, general internists, and family physicians. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2589–2600.
6. ten Cate O. Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. J Grad Med Educ 2013;5:157–158.
7. Caverzagie KJ, Cooney TG, Hemmer PA, et al. The development of entrustable professional activities for internal medicine residency training: a report from the Education Redesign Committee of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. Acad Med 2015;90:479–484.
8. Shojania KG, Fletcher KE, Saint S. Graduate medical education and patient safety: a busy—and occasionally hazardous—intersection. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:592–598.
9. Rosenbaum L. Leaping without looking—duty hours, autonomy, and the risks of research and practice. N Engl J Med 2016;374:701–703.
10. Kilminster SM, Jolly BC. Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review. Med Educ 2000;34:827–840.
11. Kennedy TJ, Lingard L, Baker GR, et al. Clinical oversight: conceptualizing the relationship between supervision and safety. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:1080–1085.
12. Farnan JM, Petty LA, Georgitis E, et al. A systematic review: the effect of clinical supervision on patient and residency education outcomes. Acad Med 2012;87:428–442.
13. Finn KM, Metlay JP, Chang Y, et al. Effect of increased inpatient attending physician supervision on medical errors, patient safety, and resident education: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178:952–959.
14. Biondi EA, Varade WS, Garfunkel LC, et al. Discordance between resident and faculty perceptions of resident autonomy: can self-determination theory help interpret differences and guide strategies for bridging the divide? Acad Med 2015;90:462–471.
15. Hoffman BD. Using self-determination theory to improve residency training: learning to make omelets without breaking eggs. Acad Med 2015;90:408–410.
16. Mieczkowski AE, Rubio D, Van Deusen R. Perceptions of internal medicinepediatrics residents about autonomy during residency. J Grad Med Educ 2014;6:330–334.
17. Crockett C, Joshi C, Rosenbaum M, et al. Learning to drive: resident physicians’ perceptions of how attending physicians promote and undermine autonomy. BMC Med Educ 2019;19:293.
18. Farnan JM, Johnson JK, Meltzer DO, et al. Strategies for effective on-call supervision for internal medicine residents: the superb/safety model. J Grad Med Educ 2010;2:46–52.
19. ten Cate O, Carraccio C, Damodaran A, et al. Entrustment decision making: extending Miller’s pyramid. Acad Med 2021;96:199–204.
20. Salerno SM, Jackson JL, O’Malley PG. Interactive faculty development seminars improve the quality of written feedback in ambulatory teaching. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:831–834.
21. Jackson JL, Kay C, Jackson CW, et al. The quality of written feedback by attendings of internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:973–978.
22. Tekian A, Park YS, Tilton S, et al. Competencies and feedback on internal medicine residents’ end-of-rotation assessments over time: qualitative and quantitative analyses. Acad Med 2019;94:1961–1969.
23. Hahn B, Waring ED, Chacko J, et al. Assessment of written feedback for emergency medicine residents. South Med J 2020;113:451–456.
24. Marcotte L, Egan R, Soleas E, et al. Assessing the quality of feedback to general internal medicine residents in a competency-based environment. CMEJ 2019;10:e32–e47.
25. Tomiak A, Braund H, Egan R, et al. Exploring how the new entrustable professional activity assessment tools affect the quality of feedback given to medical oncology residents. J Cancer Educ 2020;35:165–177.
26. Berbano EP, Browning R, Pangaro L, et al. The impact of the Stanford Faculty Development Program on ambulatory teaching behavior. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:430–434.
27. Holmboe ES, Fiebach NH, Galaty LA, et al. Effectiveness of a focused educational intervention on resident evaluations from faculty: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:427–434.