Original Article

How Do Internal Medicine Residency Programs Evaluate Their Resident Float Experiences?

Authors: Sara L. Wallach, MD, Khursheed Alam, MBBS, Nancy Diaz, BA, Daniel Shine, MD

Abstract

Objectives:We surveyed the nation's internal medicine residency training program directors to determine the range and frequency of existing methods by which float experiences are evaluated. Methods:We sent questionnaires to the program directors of all 396 internal medicine residency training program sites in the country. Information requested included program characteristics, months devoted to float experiences in each year of training, and the location and purpose of the rotation. Program directors were also asked to choose among descriptors characterizing the evaluative process. Results:There were 139 responding programs (39%), 134 with data that could be aggregated. Responding programs were similar to all programs nationally in the distributions of size and university sponsorship. Overall, 76% of programs employed a night float for any period of time, and 71% currently had one, on average for 6.7 years. Mean months of float experience during residency was 2.4 months, significantly longer in programs that were not university based. Float experiences were evaluated in 89% of those programs who employed them, with ten different methods reported. University-based programs were significantly less likely to use chart review as a method of evaluation, but no other differences in methodology were significant. Conclusions:Float rotations are common among internal medicine residency training programs. Evaluative methods vary, but one or more are applied in the vast majority of programs.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Asch DA, Parker RM. The Libby Zion case. One step forward or two steps backward? N Engl J Med1988;318:771–775.
 
2. Buff D, Shabti R. The night float system of resident on call: what do the nurses think? J Gen Intern Med 1995;10:400–402.
 
3. Gottlieb DJ, Peterson CA, Parenti CM, et al. Effects of a night float system on housestaff neuropsychologic function. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:146–148.
 
4. Trontell MC, Carson JL, Taragin MI, et al. The impact of the night float system on internal medicine residency programs. J Gen Intern Med 1991;6:445–449.
 
5. Rosenberg M, McNulty D. Beyond night float? The impact of call structure on internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10:95–98.
 
6. Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE. Methods for evaluating the clinical competence of residents in internal medicine: a review. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:42–48.
 
7. Klessig JM. A pilot survey study to define quality in residency education. Acad. Med 2000;75:71–73.
 
8. DaRosa DA. Assessment of a surgery clerkship's performance evaluation system. Am J Surg2000;179:145–149.