Review Article

Imaging of the Vulnerable Plaque: New Modalities

Authors: Vishal Bhatia, MD, Ruchi Bhatia, MBBS, Sandeep Dhindsa, MD, Mandeep Dhindsa, MBBS

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is currently considered to be an inflammatory and thus a systemic disease affecting multiple arterial beds. Recent advances in intravascular imaging have shown multiple sites of atherosclerotic changes in coronary arterial wall. Traditionally, angiography has been used to detect and characterize atherosclerotic plaque in coronary arteries, but recently it has been found that plaques that are not significantly stenotic on angiography cause acute myocardial infarction. As a result, newer imaging and diagnostic modalities are required to predict which of the atherosclerotic plaque are prone to rupture and hence distinguish “stable” and “vulnerable”plaques. Intravascular ultrasound can identify multiple plaques that are not seen on coronary angiography. Thermography has shown much promise and is based on the concept that the inflammatory plaques are associated with increased temperature and can also identify “vulnerable patients.” Of all these newer modalities, magnetic resonance imaging has shown the most promise in identification and characterization of vulnerable plaques. In this article, we review the newer coronary artery imaging modalities and discuss the limitations of traditional coronary angiography.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Fuster V, Lewis A. Conner Memorial Lecture: Mechanisms leading to myocardial infarction—Insights from studies of vascular biology. Circulation 1994; 90: 2126–2146.
2. Loree HM, Kamm RD, Stringfellow RG, et al. Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels. Circ Res 1992; 71: 850–858.
3. Loree HM, Tobias BJ, Gibson LJ, et al. Mechanical properties of model atherosclerotic lesion lipid pools. Arterioscler Thromb 1994; 14: 230–234.
4. Small DM. George Lyman Duff memorial lecture: Progression and regression of atherosclerotic lesions—Insights from lipid physical biochemistry. Arteriosclerosis 1988; 8: 103–129.
5. Lundberg B. Chemical composition and physical state of lipid deposits in atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 1985; 56: 93–110.
6. Libby P. Changing concepts of atherogenesis. J Intern Med 2000; 247: 349–358.
7. Fuster V, Fayad ZA, Badimon JJ. Acute coronary syndromes: Biology. Lancet 1999; 353( Suppl 2): SII5–SII9.
8. Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995; 92: 657–671.
9. Zaman AG, Helft G, Worthley SG, et al. The role of plaque rupture and thrombosis in coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2000; 149: 251–266.
10. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, et al. Lessons from sudden coronary death: A comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20: 1262–1275.
11. Alderman EL, Corley SD, Fisher LD, et al. Five-year angiographic follow-up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): CASS Participating Investigators and Staff. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1141–1154.
12. Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, et al. Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 56–62.
13. Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, et al. Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation 1988; 78: 1157–1166.
14. Nobuyoshi M, Tanaka M, Nosaka H, et al. Progression of coronary atherosclerosis: Is coronary spasm related to progression? J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 904–910.
15. Giroud D, Li JM, Urban P, et al. Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 729–732.
16. Losordo DW, Rosenfield K, Kaufman J, et al. Focal compensatory enlargement of human arteries in response to progressive atherosclerosis: In vivo documentation using intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 1994; 89: 2570–2577.
17. Vavuranakis M, Stefanadis C, Toutouzas K, et al. Impaired compensatory coronary artery enlargement in atherosclerosis contributes to the development of coronary artery stenosis in diabetic patients: An in vivo intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 1090–1094.
18. Ahmed JM, Mintz GS, Weissman NJ, et al. Mechanism of lumen enlargement during intracoronary stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2000; 102: 7–10.
19. Berglund H, Luo H, Nishioka T, et al. Highly localized arterial remodeling in patients with coronary atherosclerosis: An intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1997; 96: 1470–1476.
20. Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, et al. Morphological predictors of arterial remodeling in coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002; 105: 297–303.
21. Gussenhoven EJ, Essed CE, Lancee CT, et al. Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: An in vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 947–952.
22. Potkin BN, Bartorelli AL, Gessert JM, et al. Coronary artery imaging with intravascular high-frequency ultrasound. Circulation 1990; 81: 1575–1585.
23. Peters RJ, Kok WE, Havenith MG, et al. Histopathologic validation of intracoronary ultrasound imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1994; 7: 230–241.
24. Komiyama N, Berry GJ, Kolz ML, et al. Tissue characterization of atherosclerotic plaques by intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency signal analysis: An in vitro study of human coronary arteries. Am Heart J 2000; 140: 565–574.
25. Ge J, Baumgart D, Haude M, et al. Role of intravascular ultrasound imaging in identifying vulnerable plaques. Herz 1999; 24: 32–41.
26. Mizuno K, Miyamoto A, Satomura K, et al. Angioscopic coronary macromorphology in patients with acute coronary disorders. Lancet 1991; 337: 809–812.
27. Thieme T, Wernecke KD, Meyer R, et al. Angioscopic evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques: Validation by histomorphologic analysis and association with stable and unstable coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1–6.
28. Asakura M, Ueda Y, Yamaguchi O, et al. Extensive development of vulnerable plaques as a pan-coronary process in patients with myocardial infarction: An angioscopic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1284–1288.
29. Fuster V, Badimon L, Cohen M, et al. Insights into the pathogenesis of acute ischemic syndromes. Circulation 1988; 77: 1213–1220.
30. Uchida Y, Nakamura F, Tomaru T, et al. Prediction of acute coronary syndromes by percutaneous coronary angioscopy in patients with stable angina. Am Heart J 1995; 130: 195–203.
31. Casscells W, Hathorn B, David M, et al. Thermal detection of cellular infiltrates in living atherosclerotic plaques: Possible implications for plaque rupture and thrombosis. Lancet 1996; 347: 1447–1451.
32. Verheye S, De Meyer GR, Van Langenhove G, et al. In vivo temperature heterogeneity of atherosclerotic plaques is determined by plaque composition. Circulation 2002; 105: 1596–1601.
33. Ricquier D, Bouillaud F. The uncoupling protein homologues: UCP1, UCP2, UCP3, StUCP and AtUCP. Biochem J 2000; 345: 161–179.
34. Stefanadis C, Diamantopoulos L, Vlachopoulos C, et al. Thermal heterogeneity within human atherosclerotic coronary arteries detected in vivo: A new method of detection by application of a special thermography catheter. Circulation 1999; 99: 1965–1971.
35. Stefanadis C, Toutouzas K, Tsiamis E, et al. Increased local temperature in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques: An independent predictor of clinical outcome in patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1277–1283.
36. Stefanadis C, Toutouzas K, Vavuranakis M, et al. Statin treatment is associated with reduced thermal heterogeneity in human atherosclerotic plaques. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1664–1669.
37. Spagnoli LG, Bonanno E, Mauriello A, et al. Multicentric inflammation in epicardial coronary arteries of patients dying of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1579–1588.
38. Buffon A, Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, et al. Widespread coronary inflammation in unstable angina. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 5–12.
39. Stefanadis C, Toutouzas K, Vaina S, et al. Thermography of the cardiovascular system. J Interv Cardiol 2002; 15: 461–466.
40. de Korte CL, Cespedes EI, van der Steen AF, et al. Intravascular ultrasound elastography: Assessment and imaging of elastic properties of diseased arteries and vulnerable plaque. Eur J Ultrasound 1998; 7: 219–224.
41. de Korte CL, Carlier SG, Mastik F, et al. Morphological and mechanical information of coronary arteries obtained with intravascular elastography: Feasibility study in vivo. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 405–413.
42. Brezinski ME, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE, et al. Optical coherence tomography for optical biopsy: Properties and demonstration of vascular pathology. Circulation 1996; 93: 1206–1213.
43. Romer TJ, Brennan JF III, Schut TC, et al. Raman spectroscopy for quantifying cholesterol in intact coronary artery wall. Atherosclerosis 1998; 141: 117–124.
44. Moreno PR, Lodder RA, Purushothaman KR, et al. Detection of lipid pool, thin fibrous cap, and inflammatory cells in human aortic atherosclerotic plaques by near-infrared spectroscopy. Circulation 2002; 105: 923–927.
45. Arad Y, Roth M, Newstein D, et al. Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: The St. Francis Heart Study. Presented at the 52nd scientific session of the American College of Cardiology, Chicago, March 30–April 2, 2003.
46. Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Sack S, et al. Assessment of coronary calcification by electron-beam computed tomography in symptomatic patients with normal, abnormal or equivocal exercise stress test. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1674–1682.
47. Breen JF, Sheedy PF II, Schwartz RS, et al. Coronary artery calcification detected with ultrafast CT as an indication of coronary artery disease. Radiology 1992; 185: 435–439.
48. Bielak LF, Kaufmann RB, Moll PP, et al. Small lesions in the heart identified at electron beam CT: Calcification or noise? Radiology 1994; 192: 631–636.
49. Devries S, Wolfkiel C, Fusman B, et al. Influence of age and gender on the presence of coronary calcium detected by ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 76–82.
50. Worthley SG, Helft G, Fuster V, et al. Serial in vivo MRI documents arterial remodeling in experimental atherosclerosis. Circulation 2000; 101: 586–589.
51. Helft G, Worthley SG, Fuster V, et al. Progression and regression of atherosclerotic lesions: Monitoring with serial noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002; 105: 993–998.
52. Ruehm SG, Corot C, Vogt P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque with ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation 2001; 103: 415–422.
53. Moody AR, Allder S, Lennox G, et al. Direct magnetic resonance imaging of carotid artery thrombus in acute stroke. Lancet 1999; 353: 122–123(letter).
54. Hatsukami TS, Ross R, Polissar NL, et al. Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2000; 102: 959–964.
55. Yuan C, Zhang SX, Polissar NL, et al. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation 2002; 105: 181–185.
56. Correia LC, Atalar E, Kelemen MD, et al. Intravascular magnetic resonance imaging of aortic atherosclerotic plaque composition. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997; 17: 3626–3632.
57. Weissleder R, Moore A, Mahmood U, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of transgene expression. Nat Med 2000; 6: 351–355.
58. Tempany CM, McNeil BJ. Advances in biomedical imaging. JAMA 2001; 285: 562–567.