Original Article

Impact of Bedside Rounding on Attending Teaching Evaluations

Authors: Joseph R. Sweigart, MD, William C. Lippert, MD, MPH, Hal H. Atkinson, MD, MS, Alan M. Hall, MD, Satyen Nichani, MD, John W. Ragsdale, MD, MS, Gregory B. Russell, MS, Peter R. Lichstein, MD

Abstract

Objective: To examine associations between bedside rounding (BSR) and other rounding strategies (ORS) with resident evaluations of teaching attendings and self-reported attending characteristics.

Methods: Faculty from three academic medical centers who attended resident teaching services for ≥4 weeks during the 2018–2019 academic year were invited to complete a survey about personal and rounding characteristics. The survey instrument was iteratively developed to assess rounding strategy as well as factors that could affect choosing one rounding strategy over another. Survey results and teaching evaluation scores were linked, then deidentified and analyzed in aggregate. Included evaluation items assessed resident perceptions of autonomy, time management, professionalism, and teaching effectiveness, as well as a composite score (the numeric average of each attending’s scores for all of the items at his or her institution). BSR was defined as spending >50% of rounding time in patients’ rooms with the team. Hallway rounding and conference room rounding were combined into the ORS category and defined as >50% of rounding time in these settings. All of the scores were normalized to a 10-point scale to allow aggregation across sites.

Results: A total of 105 attendings were invited to participate, and 65 (62%) completed the survey. None of the resident evaluation scores significantly differed based on rounding strategy. Composite scores were similar for BSR and ORS (difference of <0.1 on a 10-point scale). Spearman correlation coefficients identified no statistically significant correlation between rounding strategy and evaluation scores. An exploratory analysis of variance model identified no single factor that was significantly associated with composite teaching scores (P > 0.45 for all) or the domains of teaching efficacy, professionalism, or autonomy (P > 0.13 for all). Having a formal educational role was significantly associated with better evaluation scores for time management, and the number of lectures delivered per year approached statistical significance for the same domain.

Conclusions: Conducting BSR did not significantly affect resident evaluations of teaching attendings. Resident perception of teaching effectiveness based on rounding strategy should be neither a motivator nor a barrier to widespread institution of BSR.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Shankel SW, Mazzaferri EL. Teaching the resident in internal medicine. Present practices and suggestions for the future. JAMA 1986;256:725–729.
 
2. Ricotta DN, Freed JA, Hale AJ. Things We Do for No ReasonTM: card flipping rounds. J Hosp Med 2020;15:498–501.
 
3. Ngo TL, Blankenburg R, Uy CE. Teaching at the bedside: strategies for optimizing education on patient and family centered rounds. Pediatr Clin North Am 2019;66:881–889.
 
4. Shoeb M, Khanna R, Fang M, et al. Internal medicine rounding practices and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies. J Hosp Med 2014;9:239–243.
 
5. Ramani S, Orlander JD, Strunin L, et al. Whither bedside teaching? A focus-group study of clinical teachers. Acad Med 2003;78:384–390.
 
6. Crumlish CM, Yialamas MA, McMahon GT. Quantification of bedside teaching by an academic hospitalist group. J Hosp Med 2009;4:304–307.
 
7. Lichstein PR. Returning to the bedside: notes from a clinical educator. NC Med J 2015;76:174–179.
 
8. Gonzalo JD, Chuang CH, Huang G, et al. The return of bedside rounds: an educational intervention. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:792–798.
 
9. Gonzalo JD, Masters PA, Simons RJ, et al. Attending rounds and bedside case presentations: medical student and medicine resident experiences and attitudes. Teach Learn Med 2009;21:105–110.
 
10. Rabinowitz R, Farnan J, Hulland O, et al. Rounds today: a qualitative study of internal medicine and pediatrics resident perceptions. J Grad Med Educ 2016;8:523–531.
 
11. Janicik RW, Fletcher KE. Teaching at the bedside: a new model. Med Teach 2003;25:127–130.
 
12. Lichstein PR, Atkinson HH. Patient-centered bedside rounds and the clinical examination. Med Clin N Am 2018;102:509–519.
 
13. Lehmann LS, Brancati FL, Chen MC, et al. The effect of bedside case presentations on patients’ perceptions of their medical care. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1150–1156.
 
14. Monash B, Najafi N, Mourad M, et al. Standardizing attending rounds to improve the patient experience: a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. J Hosp Med 2017;12:143–149.
 
15. Ramani S. Twelve tips to improve bedside teaching. Med Teach 2003;25:112–115.
 
16. Gonzalo JD, Heist BS, Duffy BL, et al. The art of bedside rounds: a multicenter qualitative study of strategies used by experienced bedside teachers. J Gen Intern Med 2012;28:412–420.
 
17. Huff NG, Roy B, Estrada CA, et al. Teaching behaviors that define highest rated attending physicians: a study ofthe resident perspective.Med Teach 2014;36:991–996.