Improving Critical Value Read-Back Failure Rate by Modifying the Notification Procedure
AbstractObjectives: The aim of the study was to determine whether a system process change improved successful read-back of critical values by the appropriate provider.
Methods: The study implemented a system process change of switching the “first call” physician from the admitting physician to the most recent document writer. Data were compared before (N = 301) and after the intervention (N = 201). Predictor variables included patient factors, physician factors, and environmental factors. The outcome variables measured were successful read-back within 5 and 30 minutes.
Results: Read-back failure within 5 minutes was significantly reduced (P < 0.001) from preintervention (49.5%) to postintervention (31.3%). Multivariate logistic regression showed reduced odds for read-back failure postintervention (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31–0.67, P < 0.001) and increased odds for read-back failure for patients of Hispanic race/ethnicity (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.09–2.89, P < 0.05). Read-back failure within 30 minutes did not significantly change. Multivariate logistic regression showed that an increased number of telephone calls were associated with an increased odds for read-back failure (OR 3.12, 95% CI 2.13–4.57, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: We recommend the use of the physician who has most recently engaged with the patient as documented in the medical record for the daily note as the primary source of contact for reporting critical values.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view your purchase options.
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.