Original Article
CME Article: Integration of Sex and Gender Minority Standardized Patients into a Workshop on Gender-Inclusive Patient Care: Exploring Medical Student Perspectives
Abstract
Objectives: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) communities experience significant health disparities. Although coverage of health issues specific to these communities has increased in the undergraduate medical curriculum, there is still opportunity for improved teaching about sexual diversity and inclusive care. The goal of this study was to assess students' perceptions of and satisfaction with a half-day workshop focused on sexual history taking and transgender health.Methods: The second-year clinical skills course at the Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine includes a sexual history workshop that starts with a 1-hour lecture on sexual history taking. This is followed by a faculty-facilitated small group session during which students interview an SGM patient and debrief about this experience. In 2020, for the first time, the standardized patients were members of the SGM community, and the session was on Zoom. Students completed an optional, anonymous postsession survey assessing the workshop.
Results: Students overwhelmingly believed that the integration of SGM standardized patients into the session helped improve their knowledge, attitudes, and skills related to providing care for this population. They noted that the standardized patient interaction and debriefing were the most beneficial parts of the session.
Conclusions: Given the positive feedback, future iterations of this session will continue to use the SGM community as standardized patients. In addition, student competency related to SGM patient care will be assessed through observed structured clinical examinations.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Hollenbach AD, Eckstrand KL, Dreger AD. Implementing curricular and institutional climate changes to improve health care for individuals who are LGBT, gender nonconforming, or born with DSD: a resource for medical educators. https://store.aamc.org/implementing-curricular-and-institutional-climate-changes-to-improve-health-care-for-individuals-who-are-lgbt-gender-nonconforming-or-born-with-dsd-a-resource-for-medical-educators.html. Published 2014. Accessed March 30, 2021.
2. Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office, National Institutes of Health. Home page. https://dpcpsi.nih.gov/sgmro. Accessed November 24, 2021.
3. Lambda Legal. When health care isn’t caring: Lambda Legal’s survey of discrimination against LGBT people and people with HIV. https://www.lambdalegal.org/publications/when-health-care-isnt-caring. Published 2010. Accessed March 30, 2021.
4. Roth Bayer C, Eckstran KL, Knudson G, et al. Sexual health competencies for undergraduate medical education in North America. J Sex Med 2017; 14:535–540.
5. Stumbar SE, Brown DR, Lupi CS. Developing and implementing curricular objectives for sexual health in undergraduate medical education: a practical approach. Acad Med 2020;95:77–82.
6. Criniti S, Andelloux M, Woodland MB, et al. The state of sexual health education in US medicine. Am J Sex Educ 2014;9:65–80.
7. Malhotra S, Khurshid A, Hendricks KA, et al. Medical school sexual health curriculum and training in the United States. J Natl Med Assoc 2008;100: 1097–1106.
8. Parish SJ, Clayton AH. Sexual medicine education: review and commentary. J Sex Med 2007;4:259–267.
9. Zelin NS, Hastings C, Beaulieu-Jones BR, et al. Sexual and gender minority health in medical curricula in New England: a pilot study of medical student comfort, competence and perception of curricula. Med Educ Online 2018; 23:1461513.
10. Bohnert CA, Combs RM, Noonan EM, et al. Gender minorities in simulation: a mixed methods study of medical school standardized patient programs in the United States and Canada. Simul Healthc 2021;16:e151–e158.
11. Noonan EJ, Weingartner LA, Combs RM, et al. Perspectives of transgender and genderqueer standardized patients. Teach Learn Med 2021;33:116–128.
12. Rubin ES, Rullo J, Tsai P, et al. Best practices in North American pre-clinical medical education in sexual history taking: consensus from the Summits in Medical Education in Sexual Health. J Sex Med 2018;15:1414–1425.
13. Stumbar SE, Garba NA, Stevens M, et al. Using a hybrid lecture and small-group standardized patient case to teach the inclusive sexual history and transgender patient care. South Med J 2021;114:17–22.
