Original Article

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Use of Emergency Contraception Among Rural Western North Carolina Women

Authors: E Blake Fagan, MD, H Eleni Boussios, MPH, Ruchi Moore, MD, Shelley L. Galvin, MA

Abstract

Background: To determine the knowledge, attitudes and self-reported usage of emergency contraception (EC) in rural western North Carolina women.


Methods: Using a cross-sectional survey, with a convenience sample, participants self-administered the survey in waiting rooms of eight medical clinics in three counties in western North Carolina. Participants included 401 English-speaking women of childbearing age (18–44 years old) presenting for routine medical care during a three-month period in 2004.


Results: Of the 70.5% who responded, almost all (97%) were sexually active and most (92%) perceived an unintended pregnancy to be a problem. A majority of the participants (72%) were aware of EC, but only 7.5% of women reported usage in the last year. More than 80% of the surveyed women were uncertain if EC was the same as the abortion pill, RU-486. While only 16% of respondents indicated they had discussed EC with a doctor or another health professional, most women (89%) reported that doctors or other health professionals would be their first choice for accurate information about EC pills.


Conclusions: Among western North Carolina women of childbearing age, EC is rarely used, perhaps because of confusion about its mechanism of action. Furthermore, EC is infrequently discussed with doctors. Since women indicate that health care providers would be their preferred choice for accurate information about EC, improved patient education by physicians about EC would be a first step in increasing knowledge among patients.


Key Points


* Over 80% of surveyed women incorrectly believed or expressed confusion about emergency contraception being the same as the abortion pill.


* Very few women (7.5%) in western North Carolina report use of emergency contraception (EC); however, 46% report being likely to use EC in the future.


* Women without accurate knowledge about EC have more objection to potential use of EC than women with accurate information (OR = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.107–3.089).


* Most women (89%) desire to obtain accurate information about EC from their care provider but only 16% reported any discussion of EC by their care provider with them.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:24–29.
 
2. Ventura SJ, Abma JC, Mosher WD, et al. Estimated pregnancy rates for the United States, 1990-2000: an update. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2004;52. Available at:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_23.pdf. Accessed June 2, 2006.
 
3. Beck L, Johnson C, Morrow B, et al. PRAMS 1999 Surveillance Report. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51:1–27.
 
4. Jones RK, Darroch JE, Henshaw SK. Contraceptive use among US women having abortions in 2000-2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002;34:294–303.
 
5. Raine TR, Harper CC, Rocca CH, et al. Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA2005;293:54–62.
 
6. Trussell J, Stewart F, Guest F, et al. Emergency contraceptive pills: a simple proposal to reduce unintended pregnancies. Fam Plann Perspect 1992;24:269–273.
 
7. Rodrigues I, Grou F, Joly J. Effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected sexual intercourse. Am J Obstet Gyneco 2001;184:531–537.
 
8. Trussell J, Stewart F, Guest F, et al. Emergency contraception: a review of the programmatic and social science literature. Contraception 2000;61:145–186.
 
9. Delbanco SF, Stewart FH, Koenig JD, et al. Are we making progress with emergency contraception? Recent findings on American adults and health professionals. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1998;53:242–246.
 
10. Anonymous. Improving access to emergency contraceptive pills. Popul Briefs 1999;5:3.
 
11. Glasier A. Emergency contraception. Br Med Bull 2000;56:729–738.
 
12. Pham A. Emergency contraception (post-coital Contraception). J Okla State Med Assoc2002;95:371–374.
 
13. Jackson R, Schwarz EB, Feedman L, et al. Knowledge and willingness to use emergency contraception among low-income post-partum women. Contraception 2000;61:351–357.
 
14. Salganicoff A, Wentworth B, Ranji U. Emergency Contraception in California; Findings from a 2003 Kaiser Family Foundation Survey. Available at: http://www.kff.org/womenshealth/whp021804pkg.cfm. Accessed June 2, 2006.
 
15. Smit J, McFadyen L, et al. Emergency contraception in South Africa: knowledge, attitudes and use among public sector primary health care clients. Contraception 2001;64:333–337.
 
16. Van Royen AR, Calvin CK, Lightner CR. Knowledge and Attitudes About Emergency Contraception in a Military Population. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:921–925.
 
17. Foster D, Harper C, Bley J, et al. Knowledge of emergency contraception among women aged 18-44 in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:150–156.
 
18. Sorhaindo A, Becker D, Fletcher H, et al. Emergency contraception among university students in Kingston, Jamaica: A survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices. Contraception 2002;66:261–268.
 
19. Croxatto HB, Ortiz ME, Mechanisms of action of emergency contraception. Steroids 2003;68:1095–1098.
 
20. Post-coital administration of levonorgestrel does not interfere with post-fertilization events in the new-world monkey Cebus apella. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1352–1356.
 
21. Delbanco SF, Mauldon J, Smith MD. Little knowledge and limited practice: emergency contraceptive pills, the public and the obstetrician-gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol |  |  1997;89:1006–1011.
 
22. Buncombe County Educational Attainment, 2000 Census Data. Available at:http://www.censusscope.org/us/s37/c21/print_chart_education.html. Accessed June 2, 2006.