Primary Article
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This prospective clinical study was done because our initial retrospective review suggested that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) offers no significant advantages over open appendectomy (OA) yet is significantly more expensive. From July 1992 to August 1993, 57 patients were approached preoperatively for randomization to either LA (n=19) or OA (n=18). There were no statistically significant differences between the LA and OA groups in operative risk: mean age, 28 ± 2 vs 26 ± 2 years; percent female, 26% vs 22%; body mass index, 24 ± 0.8 vs 26 ± 1.2 kg/m2. All patients were either ASA class I or class II, 78% in each group being class II. The differences between the LA and OA groups in mean operating time required (93 ± 12 vs 87 ± 8 minutes), postoperative intramuscular narcotic analgesic usage (24 ± 6 vs 26 ± 6 hours), postoperative hospital stay (57 ± 12 vs 66 ± 10 hours), and return to normal activity (20 ± 6 vs 14 ± 3 days) were also not significant. However, LA was much more expensive because of higher operating room charges. The mean total hospital bill was $4,600 ± $160 for the LA group and $1,700 ± $70 for the OA group. This prospective study corroborated our previous analysis. Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe, effective, and expensive and overall has no greatly significant advantages over open appendectomy.This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.