Original Article

Molecular Epidemiologic Surveillance of Salmonellosis in Arkansas

Authors: Gordon E. Schutze, MD, Ellie L. Flick, MSED, Rossina Stefanova, PHD, H.J. Spencer, MS, Shelly Y. Lensing, MS, Dennis A. Berry, MS, M. Donald Cave, PHD

Abstract

Objectives: Salmonella serotype Newport and Salmonella serotype Typhimurium are the most commonly identified serotypes of Salmonella causing human disease in the state of Arkansas. The purpose of our study was to compare the results of standard and molecular epidemiologic methods of investigating human salmonellosis cases due to Salmonellaserotype Newport and Salmonella serotype Typhimurium.


Methods: All isolates of Salmonella serotype Newport and Salmonella serotype Typhimurium collected and submitted to the Arkansas Department of Health between July 1, 1997 and June 30, 1998 were gathered and underwent pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Patients from whom the isolates were collected were contacted and completed a questionnaire.


Results: There were 84 patients from whom Salmonella serotype Newport was isolated and 83 from whom Salmonella serotype Typhimurium was isolated during the study period. In the 124 patients (74%) who completed the questionnaire, Salmonella serotype Newport was more likely to be the infecting agent in younger, white, and pet-owning patients (P < 0.05). The use of PFGE confirmed that approximately 20% of the organisms had genetic fingerprint patterns identical to those of at least one other individual in the state. One third of the patients from whom these isolates were obtained were linked by standard epidemiologic methods.


Conclusions: The use of PFGE on our state’s most common isolates provides additional confirmation that despite being linked by time of onset and location of residence, the majority of the human salmonellosis cases in our region are still sporadic. Low-level, intermittent transmission of these organisms through environmental contamination and contact with asymptomatically infected individuals would be likely vehicles of transmission in our state. Molecular techniques are important in surveillance systems that investigate human salmonellosis. Eighty-one percent of the Salmonella serotype Newport and 92% of theSalmonella serotype Typhimurium cases that appeared to be outbreak-related based upon time of onset and location were actually found not to be outbreak-related by PFGE. Using techniques such as PFGE will allow for more focused evaluations of potential outbreaks and will save the already limited financial and human resources that would otherwise be spent on investigations that are not warranted.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Schutze GE, Flick EL, Pope SK, et al. Epidemiology of salmonellosis in Arkansas. South Med J1995;88:195–199.
 
2. L’Ecuyer PB, Diego J, Murphy D, et al. Nosocomial outbreak of gastroenteritis due to Salmonella senftenberg. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:734–742.
 
3. Puohiniemi R, Heiskanen T, Siitonen A. Molecular epidemiology of two international sprout-borneSalmonella outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:2487–2491.
 
4. Taylor JP, Barnett BJ, del Rosario L, et al. Prospective investigation of cryptic outbreaks ofSalmonella agona salmonellosis. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:2861–2864.
 
5. Bender JB, Hedberg CW, Boxrud DJ, et al. Use of molecular subtyping in surveillance for Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium. N Engl J Med 2001;344:189–195.
 
6. Murase T, Okitsu T, Suzuki R, et al. Evaluation of DNA fingerprinting by PFGE as an epidemiologic tool for Salmonella infections. Microbiol Immunol 1995;39:673–676.
 
7. Schutze GE, Kirby RS, Flick EL, et al. Epidemiology and molecular identification of Salmonellainfections in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:659–664.
 
8. Schutze GE, Sikes JD, Stefanova R, et al. The home environment and salmonellosis in children.Pediatrics 1999;103:e1.
 
9. Giammanco GM, Pignato S, Mammina C, et al. Persistent endemicity of Salmonella bongori48:z35:–in Southern Italy: Molecular characterization of human, animal, and environmental isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:3502–3505.
 
10. Winthrop KL, Palumbo MS, Farrar JA, et al. Alfalfa sprouts and Salmonella kottbus infection: A multistate outbreak following inadequate seed disinfection with heat and chlorine. J Food Prot2003;66:13–17.
 
11. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: Criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol1995;33:2233–2239.
 
12. Angulo FJ, Tippen S, Sharp DJ, et al. A community waterborne outbreak of salmonellosis and the effectiveness of a boil water order. Am J Public Health 1997;87:580–584.
 
13. Burton GA Jr, Gunnison D, Lanza GR. Survival of pathogenic bacteria in various freshwater sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987;53:633–638.
 
14. Haddock RL. Salmonella in vacuum cleaners [letter]. Lancet 1986;2:637.
 
15. Haddock RL, Malilay J. A search for infant salmonellosis risk factors on Guam. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1986;17:38–42.
 
16. Buchwald DS, Blaser MJ. A review of human salmonellosis: Part II. Duration of excretion following infection with nontyphi Salmonella. Rev Infect Dis 1984;6:345–356.
 
17. Deutch M, Sonnenwirth A. Salmonellosis in private practice: How helpful are stool cultures?Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1965;35:511–514.
 
18. Rosenstein BJ. Salmonellosis in infants and children. J Pediatr 1967;70:1–7.
 
19. Szanton VL. Epidemic salmonellosis: A 30-month study of 80 cases of Salmonella oranienburginfection. Pediatrics 1957;20:794–808.
 
20. van Schothorst M, Huisman J, van Os M. Search for salmonellas in homes with salmonellosis in infants [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1978;122:1121–1125.
 
21. Wilson R, Feldman RA, Davis J, et al. Salmonellosis in infants: The importance of intrafamilial transmission. Pediatrics 1982;69:436–438.
 
22. Wegener HC, Baggesen DL. Investigation of an outbreak of human salmonellosis caused bySalmonella enterica ssp. enterica serovar Infantis by use of pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Int J Food Microbiol 1996;32:125–131.
 
23. Hedberg CW, David MJ, White KE, et al. Role of egg consumption in sporadic Salmonella enteritidisand Salmonella typhimurium infections in Minnesota. J Infect Dis 1993;167:107–111.
 
24. Schutze GE, Fawcett HA, Lewno MJ, et al. Prevalence of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry shell eggs in Arkansas. South Med J 1996;89:889–891.