The Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) is the official, peer-reviewed journal of the Southern Medical Association. It has a multidisciplinary and inter-professional focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists.

SMJ // Article

Original Article

Novel Innovation Curriculum in Internal Medicine Residency Training

Authors: Kamal Shair, MD, MEng, Emily Wolf, MD, Himesh Zaver, MD, Aman Bali, MD, Benjamin McCormick, MD, Justin Call, MD, Jaimie Grega, BS, Turner Gibson, MS, J. Colt Cowdell, MD, MBA, Abdallah El Sabbagh, MD, Mary Hedges, MD

Abstract

Objective: Innovation in medicine places the needs of our patients first by developing new solutions to healthcare challenges; however, formal education in innovation has not been previously established in Internal Medicine (IM) residency training programs. A novel innovation curriculum was implemented in the IM residency training program at an academic medical institution in the southeastern United States during the academic year 2022–2023.

Methods: The innovation curriculum was divided into three phases: Inspire, Acquire, Apply. The Inspire phase included presentations by innovators sharing their journey. The Acquire phase included presentations to help take an idea to implementation, including artificial intelligence (AI), three-dimensional (3D) printing, patents, and entrepreneurship. The Apply phase supported residents in implementing their own innovative project or idea, including preparation for local think tanks and engagement with institutional resources. Interactive presentations were scheduled during noon conference, which all residents were scheduled to regularly attend. A precurriculum survey was obtained before implementation to assess residents’ baseline knowledge and experience in medical innovation, and a postcurriculum survey was obtained at the end of 1 academic year to assess resident perspective and knowledge after one cycle of the curriculum experience.

Results: At baseline, the majority of residents had never received formal education in innovation or entrepreneurship in medicine or patent filing. Few reported formal education on AI, 3D printing, virtual reality hardware/software, or medical application development. All respondents believed that innovation is important to clinical practice, and the majority believed that knowledge in innovation and entrepreneurship is important to being a well-rounded physician.

Conclusions: IM residents identified innovation as an important aspect of clinical training, yet they had limited exposure to and confidence in their knowledge and application of innovation and entrepreneurship in medicine. A curriculum dedicated to teaching innovation during IM training is important and can address this unmet need. Based on resident survey feedback, this curriculum has been adjusted to increase teaching in AI as well as expand the individual mentorship model for residents interested in taking their innovative idea to implementation.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Drucker PF. Creativity. The discipline of innovation. https://hbr.org/2002/08/the-discipline-of-innovation. Published August 2002. Accessed June 7, 2024.
 
2. Znios S, Makower J, Yock P, et al. Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
 
3. Niccum BA, Sarker A, Wolf SJ, et al. Innovation and entrepreneurship programs in US medical education: a landscape review and thematic analysis. Med Educ Online 2017;22: 1360722.
 
4. Maloney LM, Hakimi M, Hays T, et al. Learning the language of medical device innovation: a longitudinal interdisciplinary elective for medical students. Acad Med 2022;97:1341–1345.
 
5. Arias J, Scott KW, Zaldiver JR, et al. Innovation-oriented medical school curricula: review of the literature. Cureus 2021;13:e18498.
 
6. Grunhut J, Wyatt AT, Marques O. Educating future physicians in artificial intelligence (AI): an integrative review and proposed changes. J Med Educ Curric Dev 2021;8: 23821205211036836.
 
7. Wong DJ, Miranda-Nieves D, Nandivada P, et al. The surgical program in innovation (SPIN): a design and prototyping curriculum for surgical trainees. Acad Med 2021;96:1306–1310.
 
8. Ooi SKG, Makmur A, Soon AYQ, et al. Attitudes toward artificial intelligence in radiology with learner needs assessment within radiology residency programmes: a national multiprogramme survey. Singapore Med J 2021;62:126–134.
 
9. Succi MD, Uppot RN, Gee MS, et al. Medically engineered solutions in health care: a technology incubator and design-thinking curriculum for radiology trainees. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15:892–896.
 
10. Levin YS, Lee KC, Raff AB, et al. Training the next generation of clinician–innovators: the virtual magic wand program. JID Innov 2022;2:100108.
 
11. Bohl MA, Mooney MA, Sheehy J, et al. The Barrow Innovation Center: a novel program in neurosurgery resident education and medical device innovation. Cureus 2018;10:e2142.
 
12. Cooper A, Rodman A. AI and medical education—a 21st-century Pandora’s box. N Engl J Med 2023;389:385–387.