Original Article
Patients Use Different Words to Describe Satisfaction with Female versus Male Primary Care Physician Visits
Abstract
Objectives: Female physicians’ reputations are more vulnerable, salaries are lower, and rates of burnout are higher compared with their male counterparts. Patient satisfaction metrics can affect reputation, reimbursement, incentives, and burnout. We hypothesized that patients may have gender-based expectations of primary care physicians (PCPs) that could differentially affect patient satisfaction for female PCPs. Because patient satisfaction surveys generate physician-specific data, we analyzed free-text patient satisfaction survey comments about outpatient visits with female and male PCPs.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of publicly available Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician & Group survey responses from 2015 to 2019 attributed to 456 PCPs affiliated with one large healthcare system. Natural language processing identified frequencies of word use after stratification by “rate provider” scores and physician sex. We calculated overall and relative rates of word use between groups using Wald tests.
Results: Free-text responses were contained in 112,076 surveys. The mean “rate provider” score was high (9.6/10) and did not differ by physician sex. Among the 92.8% highly rated visits, words used more often for female PCPs included time, caring, feel, concerns, and like and for male PCPs, the words included care, good, excellent, staff, and office.
Conclusions: When comparing high-rated PCP visits, patients used different words to describe satisfaction with their female versus male PCP visits, which may suggest that patients hold stereotyped gender expectations for PCPs. We propose that female PCP responses to stereotyped expectations—to achieve “top box” patient satisfaction scores, which affect compensation, reputation, and job satisfaction—may provide a perspective on sex-based differences in physician pay and burnout.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Richter KP, Clark L, Wick JA, et al. Women physicians and promotion in academic medicine. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2148–2157.
2. Ness RB, Ukoli F, Hunt S, et al. Salary equity among male and female internists in Pennsylvania. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:104–110.
3. Weeks WB, Wallace TA, Wallace AE. How do race and sex affect the earnings of primary care physicians? Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:557–566.
4. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Stewart A, et al. Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA 2012;307:2410–2417.
5. Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, et al. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ 2017; 359:j4366.
6. Sarsons H. Interpreting signals in the labor market: evidence from medical referrals. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/sarsons/files/sarsons_jmp_01.pdf. Published October 31, 2017. Accessed February 23, 2025.
7. Linzer M, Harwood E. Gendered expectations: do they contribute to high burnout among female physicians? J Gen Intern Med 2018;33:963–965.
8. Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, et al. Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for Medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177: 206–213.
9. HCAHPS Fact Sheet. 2021. Available at: https://hcahpsonline.org/globalassets/hcahps/facts/hcahps_fact_sheet_march_2021.pdf. Accessed March 9, 2025.
10. Menon AV. Do online reviews diminish physician authority? The case of cosmetic surgery in the U.S. Soc Sci Med 2017;181:1–8.
11. Dennis DA. Protecting your reputation in a digital world. Todays FDA 2011;23:14-15, 17–18.
12. Rowh M. Why physicians must protect their online reputation. Med Econ 2016;93:40.
13. Lagu T, Norton CM, Russo LM, et al. Reporting of patient experience data on health systems' websites and commercial physician-rating websites: mixed-methods analysis. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e12007.
14. Reputation. Reputation report: healthcare industry '22. https://reputation.com/resources/reports-research/2022-healthcare-reputation-report/. Accessed November 28, 2022.
15. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 81 FR 79562 - Medicare program: hospital outpatient prospective payment and ambulatory surgical center payment systems and quality reporting programs; organ procurement organization reporting and communication; transplant outcome measures and documentation requirements; electronic health record (EHR) incentive programs; payment to nonexcepted off-campus provider-based department of a hospital; hospital value-based purchasing (VBP) program; establishment of payment rates under the Medicare physician fee schedule for nonexcepted items and services furnished by an offcampus provider-based department of a hospital. Fed Regist 2016;81:79562–79892.
16. Hall MF. Looking to improve financial results? Start by listening to patients. Healthc Financ Manage 2008;62:76–80.
17. Zgierska A, Rabago D, Miller MM. Impact of patient satisfaction ratings on physicians and clinical care. Patient Prefer Adherence 2014;8:437–446.
18. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey. https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/surveys-guidance/cg/index.html. Accessed November 28, 2022.
19. Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication: a metaanalytic review. JAMA 2002;288:756–764.
20. Hall JA, Roter DL, Blanch-Hartigan D, et al. How patient-centered do female physicians need to be? Analogue patients' satisfaction with male and female physicians' identical behaviors. Health Commun 2015;30:894–900.
21. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Need care? Start here. https://providers.upmc.com/search. Accessed November 2, 2019.
22. Agarwal AK, Pelullo AP, Merchant RM. "Told": the word most correlated to negative online hospital reviews. J Gen Intern Med 2019;34:1079–1080.
23. Heath JK, Weissman GE, Clancy CB, et al. Assessment of gender-based linguistic differences in physician trainee evaluations of medical faculty using automated text mining. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e193520.
24. Lopez A, Detz A, Ratanawongsa N, et al. What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:685–692.
25. Weisman CS, Rich DE, Rogers J, et al. Gender and patient satisfaction with primary care: tuning in to women in quality measurement. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2000;9: 657–665.
26. Dunivin Z, Zadunayski L, Baskota U, et al. Gender, soft skills, and patient experience in online physician reviews: a large-scale text analysis. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e14455.
27. Haynes D, Pampari A, Topham C, et al. Patient experience surveys reveal gender-biased descriptions of their care providers. J Med Syst 2021;45:90.
28. Jefferson L, Bloor K, Birks Y, et al. Effect of physicians' gender on communication and consultation length: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Health Serv Res Policy 2013;18: 242–248.
29. Ganguli I, Sheridan B, Gray J, et al. Physician work hours and the gender pay gap - evidence from primary care. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1349–1357.
30. Rittenberg E, Liebman JB, Rexrode KM. Primary care physician gender and electronic health record workload. J Gen Intern Med 2022;37:3295–3301.
31. Rotenstein LS, Melnick ER, Jeffery M, et al. Association of primary care physicians' electronic inbox activity patterns with patients' likelihood to recommend the physician. J Gen Intern Med 2024;39:150–152.
