Original Article

Prevalence of Planned Abdominal Binder Use after Vaginal Delivery

Authors: Anita Madison, MD, MPH, Leah Bryan, MD, Laura Faye Gephart, MD

Abstract

Objectives: Pregnancy and vaginal delivery are risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction. Abdominal binder use may increase intraabdominal pressure, affecting pelvic floor healing or function in recently traumatized postpartum pelvic floor muscle. This study assesses the prevalence of postpartum abdominal binder use, timing, and reasons for use.

Methods: In this cross-sectional observational survey study, women who underwent a vaginal delivery at our institution were enrolled. Participants were excluded if they did not speak Spanish or English. Participants were recruited on the postpartum unit. Data were deidentified and analyzed as appropriate for each variable.

Results: In total, 673 surveys were completed. Seven were excluded because they had cesarean deliveries. The average age was 26 years. Median gravidity and parity were 2 and 2. In total, 549 women (82%) planned to wear an abdominal binder postpartum. In all, 335 women provided a specific time when they would start use: 240 women (71%) would start at ≤2 days postpartum, 60 women (18%) would start at 3 to 7 days postpartum, and 35 women (11%) would start after 1 week postpartum. Common reasons reported for use included appearance, support, pain, swelling, weight loss, and recommendation.

Conclusions: Among women delivering at our institution, planned abdominal binder use postvaginal delivery is common. The reasons cited include health and desire to return to prior body shape. The effects of using an abdominal binder in the postpartum period are unknown. More research is needed to better elucidate how increased postpartum intraabdominal pressure affects healing in traumatized pelvic floor muscles.
Posted in: Obstetrics and Gynecology55 Pregnancy23

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first.

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view your purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($15)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Krofta L, Havelkova L, Urbankova I, et al. Finite element model focused on stress distribution in the levator ani muscle during vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:275–284.
 
2. Svabik K, Shek KL, Dietz HP. How much does the levator hiatus have to stretch during childbirth? BJOG 2009;116:1657–1662.
 
3. Tunn R, DeLancey J, Howard D, et al. MR imaging of levator ani muscle recovery following vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J 1999;10:300–307.
 
4. Fairchild PS, Low LK, Kowalk KM, et al. Defining “normal recovery” of pelvic floor function and appearance in a high-risk vaginal delivery cohort. Int Urogynecol J 2020;31:495–504.
 
5. Rogers RG, Leeman LM, Borders N, et al. Contribution of the second stage of labour to pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective cohort comparison of nulliparous women. BJOG 2014;121:1145–1153.
 
6. Staer-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Hilde G, et al. Postpartum recovery of levator hiatus and bladder neck mobility in relation to pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:531–539.
 
7. Allen R, Hosker GL, Smith ARB, et al. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. BJOG 1990;97:770–779.
 
8. Van Delft KW, Thakar R, Sultan AH, et al. The natural history of levator avulsion one year following childbirth: a prospective study. BJOG 2015; 122:1266–1273.
 
9. Tarnay CM, Medendorp AR, Cohen SA, et al. Urinary incontinence & pelvic floor disorders. In: DeCherney AH, Nathan L, Laufer N, et al, eds. CURRENT Diagnosis & Treatment: Obstetrics & Gynecology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2013.
 
10. Schaffer J. Pelvic organ prolapse. In: Hoffman BL, Schorge JO, Bradshaw KD, et al, eds: Williams Gynecology. New York: McGraw Hill Education; 2016: 538–560.
 
11. Shim JH, Oh DW. Case report: physiotherapy strategies for a woman with symphysis pubis diastasis occurring during labour. Physiotherapy 2012; 98:89–91.
 
12. Henry L. Chiropractic management of postpartum pubic symphysis diastasis: a case report. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2015;59:30–36.
 
13. Ghana S, Hakimi S, Mirghafourvand M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of abdominal binders for postoperative pain, distress, and blood loss after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2017;137:271–276.
 
14. Hsu Y, Hitchcock R, Niederauer S, et al. Variables affecting intra-abdominal pressure during lifting in the early postpartum period. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2018;24:287–291.
 
15. Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, et al. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:1559–1573.
 
16. El-Mekawy H, Eldeeb A, Lythy M, et al. Effect of abdominal exercises versus abdominal supporting belt on post-partum abdominal efficiency and rectus separation. WASET 2013;7:75–79.
 
17. Eternal Blossom Birth and Beyond. The history of belly binding for a better postpartum. https://www.eternalblossombirthandbeyond.com/the-history. Published 2017. Accessed April 20, 2020.
 
18. The Bump. 12 Best postpartum belly wraps to support your Recovery. https:// www.thebump.com/a/best-postpartum-belly-wraps. Accessed April 20, 2020.
 
19. Vleeming A, Buyruk HM, Stoeckart R, et al. An integrated therapy for peripartum pelvic instability: a study of the biomechanical effects of pelvic belts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1243–1247.