The Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) is the official, peer-reviewed journal of the Southern Medical Association. It has a multidisciplinary and inter-professional focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists.

SMJ // Article

Original Article

Promoting Autonomy in Pediatric Trainees: Independent Rounding on a Pediatric Hospital Medicine Service

Authors: Kathryn Leyens, MD, MS, Erin Cummings, MD, Eleanor Sharp, MD, MS, Benjamin Miller, MD, Alexandra Mieczkowski, MD, MS, Allison Rometo, MD, John Szymusiak, MD, MS

Abstract

Objective: Trainee autonomy is a value emphasized by formal governing bodies within graduate medical education, yet prior data demonstrate that pediatric residents perceive less autonomy than attendings report providing. Independent rounding (IR) is one practice that has been demonstrated in qualitative studies to promote autonomy. The objective of our study was to promote graduated trainee autonomy and to understand the interprofessional perspectives on the implementation of IR across various domains.

Methods: A single-center mixed-methods study was conducted between July 2021 and June 2022 at a quaternary children’s hospital. IR was introduced on one inpatient team 1 day/week for the academic year. Postsurveys were sent to participants that included resident trainees, medical students, attendings, and nurses comparing IR with traditional rounding.

Results: Attendings and trainees who rotated on one of the inpatient pediatrics teams were automatically enrolled in this study, which included 26 medical students, 41 interns, 22 senior residents, and 15 attending physicians. IR was well received among all participants. All senior residents reported improved perceptions of autonomy. There was overall improved or lack of change in perceptions of patient safety, teaching and feedback, and clinical workflow. All attendings and trainees endorsed that residents should have the opportunity to round independently, with trainees feeling that the opportunity should be more frequent than once per week.

Conclusions: IR is a feasible and well-received method of promoting graduated trainee autonomy.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in pediatrics. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/320_pediatrics_2022.pdf. Revised 2025. Accessed February 23, 2024.
 
2. Association of American Medical Colleges. Compact between resident physicians and their teachers. https://www.aamc.org/about-us/mission-areas/biomedical-research/resident-compact. Accessed February 23, 2024.
 
3. Mieczkowski A, Rubio D, Van Deusen R. Perceptions of internal medicine-pediatrics residents about autonomy during residency. J Grad Med Ed 2014;6:330–334.
 
4. Mieczkowski AE, Gonzaga AMR, Kraemer K, et al. Perceptions of resident autonomy in internal medicine, pediatrics, and internal medicine-pediatrics. Cureus 2021;13:e13805.
 
5. Biondi EA, Varade WS, Garfunkel LC, et al. Discordance between resident and supervising physicians perceptions of resident autonomy: can self-determination theory help interpret differences and guide strategies for bridging the divide? Acad Med 2015;90:462–471.
 
6. Crockett C, Joshi C, Rosenbaum M, et al. Learning to drive: resident physicians’ perceptions of how attending physicians promote and undermine autonomy. BMC Med Educ 2019;19:293.
 
7. Beck J, Kind T, Meyer R, et al. Promoting resident autonomy during family-centered rounds: a qualitative study of resident, hospitalist, and subspecialty physicians. J Grad Med Educ 2016; 8:731–738.
 
8. Moriarity JA, Vellanki S, Trope LA, et al. Righting the autonomy-supervision pendulum: understanding the impact of independent rounds on medical students, residents, and supervising physicians. Acad Med 2020;95:S28–S36.
 
9. Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open 2016;2:8–14.
 
10. Kerlin MP, Halpern SD. Twenty-four-hour intensivist staffing in teaching hospitals: tensions between safety today and safety tomorrow. Chest 2012;141:1315–1320.