Perspectives

Recovering Critical Curriculum: Hypothesis-Driven Physical Examination as a Method to Increase Clinical Skills Teaching When Bedside Teaching Remains Limited

Authors: John M. Cunningham, MD, Jennifer E. Adams, MD

Abstract

Medical students have re-entered their clinical training in a milieu that is vastly different from the one familiar to us. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic shifted vital curriculum into the virtual setting; however, some aspects of clinical education are immobile because they are rooted to one thing: bedside teaching. Physical examination (PE) is one such example. The atrophy of PE skills leads to the increased cost of care and diagnostic error, making the teaching of these skills indispensable.1 The need to conserve personal protective equipment and limitations on student–patient interactions decrease learner time at the bedside. The pandemic also placed limitations on radiographic test ordering because of the increased time required to sterilize equipment and rooms.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first.

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view your purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($15)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Verghese A, Charlton B, Kassirer JP, et al. Inadequacies of physical examination as a cause of medical errors and adverse events: a collection of vignettes. Am JMed 2015;128:1322–1324.e3. 2. Garibaldi BT, Olson APJ. The hypothesis-driven physical examination. Med Clin North Am 2018;102:433–442. 3. Uchida T, Park YS, Ovitsh RK, et al. Approaches to teaching the physical exam to preclerkship medical students: results of a national survey. Acad Med 2019;94:129–134. 4. Stickrath C, Noble M, Prochazka A, et al. Attending rounds in the current era: what is and is not happening. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1084–1089. 5. van Dam M, Ramani S, Ten Cate O. Breathing life into bedside teaching in the era of COVID-19. Med Teach. 2020;42:1310–1312. 6. Nishigori H, Masuda K, Kikukawa M, et al. A model teaching session for the hypothesis-driven physical examination. Med Teach. 2011;33:410–417. 7. Yudkowsky R, Otaki J, Lowenstein T, et al. A hypothesis-driven physical examination learning and assessment procedure for medical students: initial validity evidence. Med Educ 2009;43:729–740. 8. Allen S, Olson A, Menk J, et al. Hypothesis-driven physical examination curriculum. Clin Teach 2017;14:417–422. 9. Bordage G. Why did I miss the diagnosis? Some cognitive explanations and educational implications. Acad Med 1999;74(10 suppl):S138–S143.