Original Article

Resident and Faculty Perceptions of Chart-Stimulated Recall

Authors: Stephen R. Holt, MD, MS, Andre N. Sofair, MD, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: Chart-stimulated recall (CSR) is a case-based interviewing technique advocated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education as an assessment tool across a variety of clinical competencies, yet resident and faculty perceptions of this exercise have not been reported previously. The authors incorporated a CSR exercise into an internal medicine residency program and sought to assess the perceptions of residents and faculty participants.

Methods: Faculty met weekly with night float residents at the end of their shift. The resident presented verbally while the faculty reviewed his or her written note. In the course of 3 years, 7 faculty and 73 residents participated. Participating residents completed an anonymous survey at the end of each academic year and faculty underwent a semistructured interview administered by the authors.

Results: A total of 73% of resident respondents believed that CSR was a valuable component of the night float rotation and should be continued. Faculty believed that the exercise allowed time for focused teaching of the night team, who otherwise received limited formal instruction. The most common critique of the sessions was the timing, because the residents often reported feeling too tired to engage actively in the sessions.

Conclusions: CSR was easy to implement, received well, and educationally valued by both residents and faculty. Participants viewed the exercise as useful for both teaching and formative assessment.

 

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Jennett P, Affleck L. Chart audit and chart stimulated recall as methods of needs assessment in continuing professional health education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1998;18:163-171.
 
2. Maatsch JL, Huang R, Downing SM, et al. Predictive validity of medical specialty examinations. https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/PB84176445.xhtml. Published 1983. Accessed November 16, 2016.
 
3. Goulet F, Jacques A, Gagnon R, et al. Assessment of family physicians' performance using patient charts: interrater reliability and concordance with chart-stimulated recall interview. Eval Health Prof 2007;30:376-392.
 
4. Hayden SR, Dufel S, Shih R. Definitions and competencies for practice-based learning and improvement. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:1242-1248.
 
5. Norman GR, Davis D, Painvin A, et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical competence of family/general physicians using multiple measures. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education 1989;:75-79.
 
6. Solomon DJ, Reinhart MA, Bridgham RG, et al. An assessment of an oral examination format for evaluating clinical competence in emergency medicine. Acad Med 1990;65(9 Suppl):S43-S44.
 
7. Parboosingh J, Avard D, Lockyer J, et al. The use of clinical recall interviews as a method of determining needs in continuing medical education. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education 1987:103-108.
 
8. Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE, Durning SJ. Practical Guide to the Evaluation of Clinical Competence. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2008:264.
 
9. Schipper S, Ross S. Structured teaching and assessment: a new chart-stimulated recall worksheet for family medicine residents. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:958-959, e352-e354.
 
10. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, et al. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:795-799.
 
11. Morgan S, Ingham G. Random case analysis-a new framework for Australian general practice training. Aust Fam Physician 2013;42:69-73.