The Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) is the official, peer-reviewed journal of the Southern Medical Association. It has a multidisciplinary and inter-professional focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists.

SMJ // Article

Case Report

Reversal of Delayed Union of Anterior Cervical Fusion Treated with Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation: Case Report

Authors: Donald Mackenzie, MD, FRCS(C), Francis D. Veninga, MD

Abstract

We present a case report of anterior cervical fusion non-union that was successfully treated with pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation. In this case, a C6–C7 nonunion was identified clinically and radiographically 1 year after surgery. Imaging revealed nonunion with partial resorption of the bone graft compared with imaging studies performed 8 months earlier. The patient wore a PEMF stimulation device for 3 h/d for 10 months. After 3 months of treatment, the patient's symptoms were resolved. X-rays obtained after 15 weeks of stimulation showed improvement in bone fusion, and x-rays obtained at 31 weeks after stimulation showed even bone density around the C7 screws. The patient remained symptom-free 13 months after the termination of PEMF stimulation at last assessment. PEMF stimulation demonstrated its clinical potential in healing established nonunion of anterior cervical spine fusion. Its use is noninvasive and can be considered an alternative to surgical intervention in selected patients.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. An HS, Simpson JM, Glover JM, et al. Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion: a prospective multicenter study. Spine 1995;20:2211–2216.
 
2. Bishop RC, Moore KA, Hadley MN. Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate: a prospective comparative analysis. J Neurosurg 1996;85:206–210.
 
3. Brodke DS, Zdeblick TA. Modified Smith-Robinson procedure for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 1992;17:S427–S430.
 
4. Emery SE, Fisher JR, Bohlman HH. Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine1997;22:2622–2625.
 
5. Fernyhough JC, White JI, LaRocca H. Fusion rates in multilevel cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients. Spine 1991;16:S561–S564.
 
6. Martin GJ Jr, Haid RW Jr, MacMillan M, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy with freeze-dried fibula allograft: overview of 317 cases and literature review. Spine 1999;24:852–859.
 
7. Palit M, Schofferman J, Goldthwaite N, et al. Anterior discectomy and fusion for the management of neck pain. Spine 1999;24:224–2228.
 
8. Schnee CL, Freese A, Weil RJ, et al. Analysis of harvest morbidity and radiographic outcome using autograft for anterior cervical fusion. Spine 1997;22:2222–2227.
 
9. Smith MD, Phillips WA, Hensinger RN. Complications of fusion to the upper cervical spine. Spine1990;16:702–705.
 
10. Young WF, Rosenwasser RH. An early comparative analysis of the use of fibular allograft versus autologous iliac crest graft for interbody fusion after anterior cervical discectomy. Spine 1993;18:1123–1124.
 
11. Zdeblick TA, Ducker TB. The use of freeze-dried allograft bone for anterior cervical fusions. Spine1991;16:726–729.
 
12. Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): description of system. Br J Radiol 1973;46:1016–1022.
 
13. Brodsky AE, Khalil MA, Sassard WR, et al. Repair of symptomatic pseudarthrosis of anterior cervical fusion: posterior versus anterior repair. Spine 1992;17:1137–1143.
 
14. Coric D, Branch CL, Jenkins JD. Revision of anterior cervical pseudarthrosis with anterior allograft fusion and plating. J Neurosurg 1997;86:969–974.
 
15. Lowery GL, Swank ML, McDonough RF. Surgical revision for failed anterior cervical fusions: articular pillar plating or anterior revision?Spine 1995;20:2436–2441.
 
16. Phillips FM, Carlson G, Emery SE, et al. Anterior cervical pseudarthrosis: natural history and treatment. Spine 1997;22:1585–1589.
 
17. Tribus CB, Corteen DP, Zdeblick TA. The efficacy of anterior cervical plating in the management of symptomatic pseudoarthrosis of the cervical spine. Spine 1999;24:860–864.
 
18. De Palma AF, Rothman RH, Lewinnek GE, et al. Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972;134:755–758.
 
19. Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs: a review of one hundred forty-six patients. Spine 1984;9:667–671.
 
20. Swain PD, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH. A comparative analysis of fusion rates and donor-site morbidity for autogeneic rib and iliac crest bone grafts in posterior cervical fusions. J Neurosurg1998;88:255–265.
 
21. Aronson N, Filtzer DL, Bagan M. Anterior cervical fusion by the Smith-Robinson approach. J Neurosurg 1968;29:396–404.
 
22. Guizzardi S, Di Silvestre M, Govoni P, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation on posterior spinal fusions: a histological study in rats. J Spinal Disord 1994;7:36–40.
 
23. Ito M, Fay LA, Ito Y, et al. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion and device-related stress shielding. Spine 1997;22:382–388.
 
24. Marks RA. Spine fusion for discogenic low back pain: evaluation of radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients treated with or without pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. Adv Ther2000;17:57–67.
 
25. Mooney V. A randomized double-blind prospective study of the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic fields for interbody lumbar fusions. Spine 1990;15:708–712.