Primary Article
Segmental Spinal Instrumentation
Abstract
Over a 21/2 -year period, I have treated 25 patients with segmental spinal instrumentation (SSI), using paired-wired Luque rods. Of 13 patients with unstable spinal fractures, seven were paraplegic. Nine had idiopathic scoliosis, and three had neurogenic scoliosis. Significant loss of correction after SSI occurred in five of the nine patients with idiopathic scoliosis and in two of the three with neurogenic scoliosis. In vitro testing of Harrington distraction rods and paired-wired L-shaped rods showed the Harrington rod to resist shortening and lateral bending due to axial compression forces better than the Luque system. From the study I conclude that postoperative brace protection is as necessary to the success of SSI as with the more traditional Harrington technique. Segmental spinal instrumentation is a powerful corrective device, but appears to be deficient in maintaining correction.This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.