The Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) is the official, peer-reviewed journal of the Southern Medical Association. It has a multidisciplinary and inter-professional focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists.

SMJ // Article

Original Article

Student Perceptions of Their Impact on the Quality of Patient Care during Third-Year Core Clerkships

Authors: Aaron David Abrishami, BS, Suzanne Minor, MD, Sarah Stumbar, MD, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: Much of the literature on value-added student roles focuses on medical student participation in health systems science–related learning experiences. Our study sought to understand how students perceive that they improve patient care in the clinical setting.

Methods: We reviewed qualitative data from the 2020–2021 academic year collected from all third-year medical students (N = 119) at the end of each of their clerkships in response to the prompt “How were you able to improve the quality of patient care?” Data were analyzed using a thematic approach of the responses from all clerkships (Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Surgery, Neurology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Psychiatry, Pediatrics). Three independent coders reviewed all of the responses, created a preliminary coding framework and corresponding themes, and then reconciled and revised codes and themes to construct a final code book.

Results: We identified seven themes regarding student perceptions of their impact on the quality of patient care. Five themes were patient facing: spending more time with patients, providing patient-centered care, completing care tasks, using evidence-based medicine, and participating in the healthcare team. Two student-facing themes also were identified, and several students reported no value-added role.

Conclusions: Most of the students perceived that they improved care quality via numerous value-added roles during their core clerkships. Many of these roles could be mapped to the Entrustable Professional Activities framework, with notable additions, including care related to social determinants of health, patient-centered communication, and patient education. These findings have implications for clinical teaching and assessment of students, clinical faculty development, and the future of Entrustable Professional Activities iterations.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Dooley-Hash S. Educating physicians: a call for reform of medical school and residency. JAMA 2010;304:1240–1241.
 
2. Gonzalo JD, Graaf D, Johannes B, et al. Adding value to the health care system: identifying value-added systems roles for medical students. Am J Med Qual 2017;32:261–270.
 
3. Gorrindo P, Peltz A, Ladner TR, et al. Medical students as health educators at a student-run free clinic. Acad Med 2014;89:625–631.
 
4. Curry RH. Meaningful roles for medical students in the provision of longitudinal patient care. JAMA 2014;312, 2335–2336. 
 
5. Gonzalo JD, Dekhtyar M, Hawkins RE, et al. How can medical students add value? Identifying roles, barriers, and strategies to advance the value of undergraduate medical education to patient care and the health system. Acad Med 2017;92:1294–1301.
 
6. Gonzalo JD, Thompson BM, Haidet P, et al. A constructive reframing of student roles and systems learning in medical education using a communities of practice lens. Acad Med 2017;92:1687–1694.
 
7. Shaheen AW, Bossenbroek Fedoriw K, Khachaturyan S, et al. Students adding value: improving patient care measures while learning valuable population health skills. Am Coll Med Qual 2019;35:70–78.
 
8. Shaheen AW, Bossenbroek Fedoriw K, Khachaturyan S, et al (2019). Aligning medical student curriculum with practice quality goals: impacts on quality metrics and practice capacity for students. Am J Med 2019;132:1478–1483.
 
9. Gonzalo JD, Wolpaw D, Graaf D, et al. Educating patient-centered, systems-aware physicians: a qualitative analysis of medical student perceptions of value-added clinical systems learning roles. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:248.
 
10. Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide no. 131. Med Teach 2020;42:1–9.
 
11. Association of American Medical Colleges.Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency. Curriculum Developers’ Guide. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2014.
 
12. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000;55:68–78.
 
13. Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. J Posit Psychol 2017;12:297–298.