The Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) is the official, peer-reviewed journal of the Southern Medical Association. It has a multidisciplinary and inter-professional focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists.

SMJ // Article

Original Article

The Doctors in the House: Examining Physician Legislators in the US Congress from 2011 to 2020

Authors: Bharat Kumar, MD, MME, Manish Suneja, MD, Melissa L. Swee, MD, MME

Abstract

Objectives: Legislation dictating federal healthcare policy is drafted largely by members of the US Senate and House of Representatives. As such, their personal and professional backgrounds play important roles in setting the national healthcare agenda. We examine the professional and legislative records of the 28 federal physician legislators with voting privileges between 2011 and 2020.

Methods: Two researchers compiled the names of every federal legislator in both the US Senate and the US House of Representatives who served at any time between 2011 and 2020. The researchers used publicly available records to abstract information regarding their professional and legislative records. Data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: The majority of the 28 federal physician legislators are Doctor of Medicine graduates (96%), Republican (86%), represent southern states (71%), were in private practice before serving as legislators (78.5%), and have not previously held elected positions as legislators (57%). Approximately 15% of the bills that they sponsor are related to health policy. Obstetrics/Gynecology, Surgery, and Family Medicine are the most common specialties. On average, it takes 25 years from medical school graduation to election to their federal legislative position. Approximately half represent states, or districts within states, in which they attended medical school or completed residency.

Conclusions: To engage in meaningful healthcare policy advocacy, professional organizations must support and encourage leadership training for physicians, increase the geographic and professional diversity of physician legislators, prioritize the election of physicians from both political parties, and inculcate deep and lasting professional relationships to physicians in Congress.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Woerheide J, Lake T, Rich EC. The role of government in physician reimbursement. Am J Med Sci 2016;351:52–58.
 
2. Grady A. Assessing physician legislators. Virtual Mentor 2005;7:828–835.
 
3. Manning JE. Membership of the 116th Congress: a profile. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R45583.pdf. Published October 20, 2020. Accessed November 25, 2020.
 
4. Library of Congress. Members of the United States Congress. https://www.congress.gov/members. Updated and accessed November 25, 2020.
 
5. Library of Congress. Policy areas – field values. https://www.congress.gov/. Updated and accessed November 25, 2020.
 
6. Florida R, Montgomery DH. How the suburbs will swing the midterm election. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-05/the-suburbs-are-the-midterm-election-battleground. Published October 5, 2018. Accessed November 25, 2020.
 
7. Schuur JD, Decker H, Baker O. Association of physician organization-affiliated political action committee contributions with US House of Representatives and Senate candidates’ stances on firearm regulation. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e187831.
 
8. Pittman D. Wanted: doctors in Congress. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/14/wanted-doctors-in-congress-594972POLITICO. Published June 4, 2018. Accessed February 4, 2021.
 
9. Grande D, Asch DA, Armstrong K. Do doctors vote? J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:585–589.
 
10. Kraus CK, Suarez TA. Is there a doctor in the house? . . . Or the Senate? Physicians in US Congress, 1960–2004. JAMA 2004;292:2125–2129.
 
11. AMPAC. AMPAC candidate workshop. https://www.ampaconline.org/ political-education/ampac-candidate-workshop. Updated 2020. Accessed November 25, 2020.
 
12. Starr B, Essis F. Civic duty: don’t be a no-show at the polls. https://www.aaos.org/aaosnow/2020/oct/advocacy/advocacy01. Updated October 1, 2020. Accessed November 25, 2020.
 
13. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Save the date: specialty physician and dentist candidate workshop. https://www.asahq.org/advocacy-and-asapac/fda-and-washington-alerts/washington-alerts/2018/09/save-the-date-specialty-physician-and-dentist-candidate-workshop. Updated September 17, 2018. Accessed November 25, 2020.
 
14. Kumar B, Swee ML, Suneja M. Leadership training programs in graduate medical education: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:175.
 
15. Association of American Medical Colleges. Physician specialty data report. Executive summary. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/data/2020-physician-specialty-data-report-executive-summary. Updated January 2021. Accessed February 4, 2021