Original Article
Utilization of 2013 BRFSS Physical Activity Data for State Cancer Control Plan Objectives: Alabama Data
Abstract
Objectives: All comprehensive US cancer control plans mention physical activity and implement physical activity promotion objectives as part of these cancer plans. The purpose of this investigation was to describe the physical activities reported by Alabama adults in the 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BFRSS) and to compare these activities by age group and relative exercise intensity.Methods: This investigation used data on 6503 respondents from the 2013 BRFSS sample of respondents from Alabama with landline and cellular telephones. Respondents were asked whether they engaged in any physical activities or aerobic exercises such as running, calisthenics, golf, gardening, or walking. Information was collected on strengthening activities such as yoga, sit-ups, push-ups, and using weight machines, free weights, and elastic bands. Relative exercise intensity was estimated for each aerobic activity by comparing the 60% maximal oxygen uptake with metabolic equivalent values.
Results: Approximately two-thirds (63.7%) of respondents reported that they engaged in exercise in the past 30 days; 45.4% participated in enough aerobic activity per week to meet guidelines, and 25.9% met the muscle-strengthening guidelines. Only 10.1% of respondents 65 years old and older met both aerobic and muscle-strengthening guidelines, compared with 15.2% of those 18 to 64 years old ( P < 0.05). The most common activity reported for ages 18 to 64 years was walking (53.3%), followed by running (12.7%), and gardening (4.7%). Among adults aged 65 and older, the top three activities were walking (63.2%), gardening (13.3%), and use of a bicycle machine (2.9%). The activity intensity was significantly greater for walking, gardening, and household activities among older adults compared with those younger than age 65.
Conclusions: Because the recommended levels of physical activity are not met by a majority of Alabama residents, it is important to incorporate this information into state cancer objectives. Older adults may have higher relative energy costs compared with younger adults. Future studies should discern whether activities previously classified as low intensity have adequate health benefits, especially for cancer survivors and older adults with comorbidities.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. American Cancer Society. Cancer treatment and survivorship facts & figures 2014-2015. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-042801.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2015.
2. Brown JC, Winters-Stone K, Lee A, et al. Cancer, physical activity, and exercise. Compr Physiol. 2012;2:2775-2809.
3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity guidelines for Americans. http://www.health.gov/paguidelines. Accessed April 3, 2015.
4. Denlinger CS, Ligibel JA, Are M, et al. Survivorship: healthy lifestyles, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12:1222-1237.
5. Knaggs JD, Larkin KA, Manini TM. Metabolic cost of daily activities and effect of mobility impairment in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59:2118-2123.
6. Hall KS, Howe CA, Rana SR, et al. METs and accelerometry of walking in older adults: standard versus measured energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:574-582.
7. Blair CK, Morey MC, Desmond RA, et al. Light-intensity activity attenuates functional decline in older cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2014;46:1375-1383.
8. Varma VR, Tan EJ, Wang T, et al. Low-intensity walking activity is associated with better health. J Appl Gerontol. 2014;33:870-877.
9. Brown JC, Ko EM, Schmitz KH. Development of a risk-screening tool for cancer survivors to participate in unsupervised moderate- to vigorous intensity exercise: results from a survey study. PM R. 2015;7:113-122.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult participation in aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities-United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013;62:326-330.
11. Leach CR, Weaver KE, Aziz NM, et al. The complex health profile of long-term cancer survivors: prevalence and predictors of comorbid conditions. J Cancer Surviv 2014;October 16 [Epub ahead of print] .
12. Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Snyder C, et al. Are exercise programs effective for improving health-related quality of life among cancer survivors? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41:E326-E342.
13. Derry HM, Jaremka LM, Bennett JM, et al. Yoga and self-reported cognitive problems in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology 2014;October 21 [Epub ahead of print] .
14. Watson KB, Frederick GM, Harris CD, et al. U.S. Adults’ Participation in Specific Activities, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System-2011. J Phys Act Health 2014;August 22 [Epub ahead of print].
15. West ST, Shores KA, Mudd LM. Association of available parkland, physical activity, and overweight in America’s largest cities. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012;18:423-430.
16. Park CH, Elavsky S, Koo KM. Factors influencing physical activity in older adults. J Exerc Rehabil. 2014;10:45-52.
17. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1575-1581.
18. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. The Compendium of Physical Activities tracking guide. Healthy Lifestyles Research Center, College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University. https://sites.google.com/site/compendiumofphysicalactivities. Accessed November 13, 2014.
19. Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(2 Suppl):S1-S14.
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2013 summary data quality report. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2013/pdf/2013_DQR.pdf. Published August 15, 2014. Accessed April 3, 2015.
21. Groves RM. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q. 2006;70:646-647.
