Original Article

Advanced Prescription of Emergency Contraceptive Pills Among Adolescents and Young Adults

Authors: Somsook Santibenchakul, MD, MPH, Mary Tschann, PhD, MPH, Alyssa Dee P. Carlson, MPH, Eric L. Hurwitz, PhD, DC, Jennifer Salcedo, MD, MPH, MPP

Abstract

Objective: To examine healthcare providers’ adherence to professional recommendations for advanced prescription of emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 432 visits by 282 unique nonpregnant women 14 to 25 years of age seen at an obstetrics and gynecology teaching clinic to determine the percentage of visits during which advanced prescriptions of ECPs were provided when indicated. A logistic regression model, which accounted for nonindependent observations through generalized estimating equations, was used to identify factors associated with the provision of ECP advanced prescriptions.

Results: Approximately one-fifth of eligible visits (19.9%) and eligible patients (19.1%) had documentation of an ECP advanced prescription when indicated. Healthcare providers in this clinical setting were more likely to prescribe ECPs to adolescents and women whose primary contraceptive methods were associated with higher failure rates in typical use, such as condoms. Compared with women aged 20 to 25 years, the adjusted odds ratio of receiving an advanced prescription for ECPs was 5.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.85–12.41) for adolescents. Compared with users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.25 (95% CI 1.62–11.15) for condom users, and 3.90 (95% CI 1.54–9.86) for users of other short-term hormonal contraceptives.

Conclusions: Despite clear professional recommendations for ECP advanced prescriptions for all women at risk for unintended pregnancy, a substantial gap exists between this standard of care and routine clinical service provision in an obstetrics and gynecology teaching clinic.
Posted in: Family Planning & Reproductive Health7

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first.

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view your purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($15)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Practice Bulletin No. 152: Emergency contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:e1-e11.
2. Stream G. The American Academy of Family Physicians Statement: AAFP opposes U.S. Department of Justice’ appeal of emergency contraception ruling. http://www.aafp.org/media-center/releases-statements/all/2013/contraception-planb.html. Published May 6, 2013. Accessed May 13, 2015.
3. Committee On Adolescence. Emergency contraception. Pediatrics 2012;130:1174-1182.
4. Polis CB, Schaffer K, Blanchard K, et al. Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention (full review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:CD005497.
5. Sherman CA, Harvey SM, Beckman LJ, et al. Emergency contraception: knowledge and attitudes of health care providers in a health maintenance organization. Womens Health Issues 2001;11:448-457.
6. Golden NH, Seigel WM, Fisher M, et al. Emergency contraception: pediatricians’ knowledge, attitudes, and opinions. Pediatrics 2001;107:287-292.
7. Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010;375:555-562.
8. Bullock H, Salcedo J. Emergency contraception: do your patients have a Plan B? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2015;42:699-712.
9. Abbott J, Feldhaus KM, Houry D, et al. Emergency contraception: what do our patients know? Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:376-381.
10. Foster DG, Harper CC, Bley JJ, et al. Knowledge of emergency contraception among women aged 18 to 44 in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:150-156.
11. Isaacs JN, Creinin MD. Miscommunication between healthcare providers and patients may result in unplanned pregnancies. Contraception 2003;68:373-376.
12. Romo LF, Berenson AB, Wu ZH. The role of misconceptions on Latino women’s acceptance of emergency contraceptive pills. Contraception 2004;69:227-235.
13. Spence MR, Elgen KK, Harwell TS. Awareness, prior use, and intent to use emergency contraception among Montana women at the time of pregnancy testing. Matern Child Health J 2003;7:197-203.
14. Vahratian A, Patel DA, Wolff K, et al. College students’ perceptions of emergency contraception provision. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008;17:103-111.
15. Trusell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher RA, , ed. Contraceptive Technology. New York: Ardent Media; 2011:20-25.
16. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-381.
17. Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, et al. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med 2008;3:17.
18. Batur P, Cleland K, McNamara M, et al. Emergency contraception: a multispecialty survey of clinician knowledge and practices. Contraception 2016;93:145-152.
19. Schempf A, Hayes D, Calhoun C, et al. Unintended pregnancy fact sheet. http://health.hawaii.gov/mchb/files/2013/05/unintendedpregnancy2010.pdf. Published December 2010. Accessed June 1, 2015.
20. 2015 population estimate summary data. http://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/census/popestimate/2015_state_pop_hi/2015_popest_sumtab.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2015.