The Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) is the official, peer-reviewed journal of the Southern Medical Association. It has a multidisciplinary and inter-professional focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists.

SMJ // Article

Original Article

Association between Main Pancreatic Duct Size, Comorbidities, and Fistula Formation after Whipple Procedure for Pancreatic Cancer

Authors: Alexandra E. Adams, MD, Satyam K. Ghodasara, BS, Jana K. Elsawwah, BA, Zubin M. Bamboat, MD, Zoltan H. Nemeth, MD, PhD

Abstract

Objective: Studies have associated abnormally dilated or constricted main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter sizes in postproximal pancreatectomies (Whipple procedures) with postoperative complications. As such, we studied the clinical factors associated with both abnormally dilated or constricted MPD diameters and perioperative factors that may influence postoperative pancreatic fistula formation.

Methods: We analyzed Whipple procedure cases for pancreatic cancer in the 2019-2021 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. We compared these three groups based on MPD diameter sizes: control group (3- to 6-mm MPD size, n = 3529), small MPD ( < 3 mm, n = 1399) cohort, and large MPD ( > 6 mm, n = 1098) group.

Results: Patients with a < 3-mm proximal MPD diameter had higher rates of organ space surgical site infection (17.73% vs 12.18%, P < 0.001) and postoperative pancreatic fistula formation (14.72% vs 7.03%, P < 0.001) when compared with the control cohort with 3 to 6 mm of MPD diameter. Moreover, soft pancreatic gland texture was observed significantly more often in the < 3-mm proximal MPD diameter group. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that small duct size ( < 3 mm) and soft pancreatic gland texture were independently associated with pancreatic fistula formation following a Whipple procedure for pancreatic cancer.

Conclusions: A < 3-mm main pancreatic duct at the head of the pancreas was found to be associated with multiple postoperative complications following the Whipple procedure with pancreatojejunostomy, affecting both patient quality of life and hospital resource utilization. Healthcare providers can measure MPD size before surgery using computed tomography, which enables better anticipation, preparation, and potential mitigation of complications.
Posted in: Gastroenterology58 Pancreatic Disease2

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Baxi AC, Jiang Q, Hao J, et al. The effect of solid pancreatic mass lesions on pancreatic duct diameter at endoscopic ultrasound. Endosc Ultrasound 2017;6:103-108.  
2. Ladas SD, Tassios PS, Giorgiotis K, et al. Pancreatic duct width: its significance as a diagnostic criterion for pancreatic disease. Hepatogastroenterology 1993;40:52-55.
 
3. Kwon W, Han Y, Byun Y, et al. Predictive Features of Malignancy in Branch Duct Type Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:2618.
 
4. Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2013;216:1-14.
 
5. Schuh F, Mihaljevic AL, Probst P, et al. A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: a classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Ann Surg 2023;277:e597-e608.
 
6. Canard JM, Lennon AM, Lé JC, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: ERCP in acute pancreatitis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Practice: Expert Consult. New York:Elsevier;2011:370-465.
 
7. Kobayashi T, Aida K, Fukui T, et al. Pancreatic ductal hyperplasia/dysplasia with obstructive chronic pancreatitis: an association with reduced pancreatic weight in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2016;59:865-867.
 
8. Bonin EA, Baron TH. Preoperative biliary stents in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011;18:621-629.
 
9. Krueger CM, Chikhladze S, Adam U, et al. The clinical impact of preoperative biliary drainage on isolated infectious complications (iiC) after pancreatic head resection-a retrospective study. BMC Surg 2022;22:71.
 
10. Zhang B, Yuan Q, Li S, et al. Risk factors of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022;101:e29757.
 
11. Roberts KJ, Hodson J, Mehrzad H, et al. A preoperative predictive score of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2014;16:620-628.
 
12. Issangya CE, Msuya D, Chilonga K, et al. Perioperative serum albumin as a predictor of adverse outcomes in abdominal surgery: prospective cohort hospital based study in northern Tanzania. BMC Surg 2020;20:155.
 
13. Shen J, Zhang Y, Hu J, et al. Albumin difference as a new predictor of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective study of 211 consecutive patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020;405:55-62.
 
14. Hussain-Amin A, Parekh A, Mohan J. Basic concepts of echocardiography hemodynamics. StatPearls. NCBI Bookshelf version. StatPearls Publishing;2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576375. Accessed January 7, 2025.
 
15. Cheng H, Chen BP, Soleas IM, et al. Prolonged Operative Duration Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017;18:722-735.
 
16. Martin AN, Narayanan S, Turrentine FE, et al. Pancreatic duct size and gland texture are associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy but not after distal pancreatectomy. PLoS One 2018;13:e0203841.
 
17. Penumadu P, Barreto SG, Goel M, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy-preventing complications. Indian J Surg Oncol 2015;6:6-15.
 
18. Hu BY, Wan T, Zhang WZ, et al. Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:7797-7805.
 
19. Russell TB, Labib PLZ, Aroori S. Five-year follow-up after pancreatoduodenectomy performed for malignancy: a single-centre study. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023;27:76-86.
 
20. Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M, et al. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg 2007;246:1058-1064.
 
21. Tanaka S, Nakaizumi A, Ioka T, et al. Main pancreatic duct dilatation: a sign of high risk for pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2002;32:407-411.
 
22. Zhou H, Li X, Wang Y, et al. Threshold of main pancreatic duct for malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm at head-neck and body-tail. BMC Gastroenterol 2022;22:473.