Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to compare Emergency Medical Technicians-Paramedics (EMT-P) perceptions of the usefulness of an automatic transport ventilator (ATV) compared with bag valve (BV) ventilation for intubated patients.
Methods: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation or assisted ventilation patients were randomly assigned by day to the ATV or BV arm of the study. Questionnaires were completed by the EMT-Ps at the conclusion of each patient enrollment. EMT-Ps were asked to rate the modality used (ATV versus BV) on ease of use, time of setup, expedition of transport, additional tasks completed, documentation, overall patient care, and patient comfort.
Results: Twenty-eight patients were entered into the study, 14 in the BV arm and 14 in the ATV arm. There were significant differences in favor of the ATV in ability to accomplish additional tasks (P = 0.01), ability to document (P = 0.04), and ability to provide patient care (P = 0.03)
Conclusions: EMT-Ps were able to accomplish more tasks, document more completely, and provide better patient care with the use of the ATV.
* Use of an automatic transport ventilator allowed EMTs to accomplish extra tasks, document better, and provide better patient care.
* Side effects are no different between the automatic transport ventilator and the bag valve.
* Physiological data can be effectively gathered during field care of intubated patients.
1. Brill S, Gurman GM, Brill G. Evaluation of the VersaMed portable ventilator: Clinical trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000;17:737.
2. Romano M, Raabe OG, Walby W, Albertson TE. The stability of arterial blood gases during transportation of patients using the RespirTech PRO. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:273–277.
3. Nolan JP, Baskett PJ. Gas-powered and portable ventilators: An evaluation of six models. Prehosp Disaster Med 1992;7:25–34.
4. Gervais HW, Eberle B, Konietzke D, Hennes HJ, Dick W. Comparison of blood gases of ventilated patients during transport. Crit Care Med 1987;15:761–763.
5. Johannigman JA, Branson RD, Johnson DJ, Davis K Jr, Hurst JM. Out-of-hospital ventilation: bag-valve device vs transport ventilator. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:719–724.
6. Wayne MA, Delbridge TR, Ornato JP, Swor RA, Blackwell T. Concepts and application of prehospital ventilation. Prehosp Emerg Care 2001;5:73–78.
7. Miyoshi E, Fujino Y, Mashimo T, Nishimura M. Performance of transport ventilator with patient-triggered ventilation. Chest 2000;118:1109–1115.
8. Dockery WK, Futterman C, Keller SR, Sheridan MJ, Akl BF. A comparison of manual and mechanical ventilation during pediatric transport. Crit Care Med 1999;27:802–806.
9. Auble TE, Menegazzi JJ, Nicklas KA. Comparison of automated and manual ventilation in a prehospital pediatric model. Prehosp Emerg Care 1998;2:108–111.
10. Rouse MJ, Branson R, Semonin-Holleran R. Mechanical ventilation during air medical transport: techniques and devices. J Air Med Transp 1992;11:5–8.
11. Grmec S, Kupnik D. Does the Mainz Emergency Evaluation Scoring (MEES) in combination with capnometry (MEESc) help in the prognosis of outcome from cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a prehospital setting? Resuscitation 2003;58:89–96.
12. Sehra R, Underwood K, Checchia P. End tidal CO2 is a quantitative measure of cardiac arrest.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003;26:515–517.
13. Grmec S, Klemen P. Does the end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) concentration have prognostic value during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Eur J Emerg Med 2001;8:263–269.
14. Ahrens T, Schallom L, Bettorf K, Ellner S, Hurt G, O'Mara V, et al. End-tidal carbon dioxide measurements as a prognostic indicator of outcome in cardiac arrest. Am J Crit Care 2001;10:391–398.
15. Bhende MS, LaCovey DC. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Emerg Care 2001;5:208–213.
16. Levine RL, Wayne MA, Miller CC. End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1997;337:301–306.
17. Ornato JP, Garnett AR, Glauser FL. Relationship between cardiac output and the end-tidal carbon dioxide tension. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1104–1106.
18. Garnett AR, Ornato JP, Gonzalez ER, Johnson EB. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA 1987;257:512–515.
19. Hurst JM, Davis K Jr, Branson RD, Johannigman JA. Comparison of blood gases during transport using two methods of ventilatory support. J Trauma 1989;29:1637–1640 Dec.