Commentary on Survey of Internal Medicine Physicians Trained in Three Different Eras: Reflections on Duty-Hour Reform”
AbstractIn this issue of the Southern Medical Journal, Burton and colleagues1 examine physician attitudes toward duty-hour reform at their institution. This topic has received strong physician response from all generations since 2003 when the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education implemented work hour restrictions.2 This study by Burton and colleagues adds to the literature that demonstrates change does not come easily in a portion of the physician community.1 The authors surveyed physicians from three discrete training eras with the intent to capture a wide spectrum of perceptions regarding duty-hour reform.1 The study suggests that among respondents, the older generation of academic physicians believes duty-hour reform may cause residents to be less prepared for future careers and focus attention on patient safety. Previous studies on this topic were challenged for their study design, validity, and lack of generalizability.3 Although this study shares some of the same limitations, we applaud the authors’ effort to explore generational attitudes toward work-hour reform.1
This content is limited to qualifying members.
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view your purchase options.
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.