Original Article

CME Article: Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Colectomies Using the 2019 ACS NSQIP Database

Authors: Sara S. Soliman, BS, Joseph Flanagan, MD, Yun Hsiang Wang, MBBS, Patricia B. Stopper, APN-C, Rolando H. Rolandelli, MD, Zoltan H. Nemeth, MD, PhD


Objectives: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (RLSs) have become increasingly common in the past decade alongside conventional laparoscopic surgeries (CLSs). In general, RLSs have been reported to be superior to CLSs; therefore, we compared both methods among patients undergoing an elective colectomy for differences in perioperative factors and postoperative complications.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. We stratified 5879 patients into two cohorts according to their preoperative diagnosis of either colon cancer or chronic diverticulitis. Patients within each group were further stratified by operative approach.

Results: Of the 5879 patients, 3210 colon cancer and 2669 chronic diverticulitis patients underwent an elective colectomy. There were no differences in length of stay and time from operation to discharge between RLSs and CLSs. RLSs, however, had significantly longer operation times (minutes; colon cancer: RLS 242.9 ± 91.0 vs CLS 177.4 ± 78.2, P < 0.001; chronic diverticulitis: RLS 226.2 ± 87.4 vs CLS 181.7 ± 74.4, P < 0.001). Among all of the colon cancer patients, RLS had higher rates of unplanned return to the operating room (P = 0.028) and organ space surgical site infection (P = 0.035). Among chronic diverticulitis patients, RLS was associated with higher rates of postoperative sepsis, anastomotic leak, organ space surgical site infection, and unplanned readmission (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: CLS may be the more efficient operative technique because it was associated with a shorter average operation time and fewer postoperative complications. This paradigm, however, may change as the robotic technology develops and surgeons become more experienced with RLS.
Posted in: Colonic And Anorectal Disease8

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($15)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.


1. Fung AK, Aly EH. Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve? Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:786–796.
2. Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O. 30 years of robotic surgery. World J Surg 2016;40:2550–2557.
3. Hanly EJ, Talamini MA. Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 2004; 188(4A suppl):19S–26S.
4. Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ, et al. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:455–463.
5. Trinh BB, Jackson NR, Hauch AT, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS 2014;18e2014:187.
6. Helvind NM, Eriksen JR, Mogensen A, et al. No differences in short-term morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for colonic cancer: a case-control study of 263 patients. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2575–2580.
7. Jara RD, Guerrón AD, Portenier D. Complications of robotic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2020;100:461–468.
8. Nozawa H, Watanabe T. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg 2017;10:364–371.
9. Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318:1569–1580.
10. Schootman M, Hendren S, Loux T, et al. Differences in effectiveness and use of robotic surgery in patients undergoing minimally invasive colectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:1296–1303.
11. Wright JP, Albert MR. A current review of robotic colorectal surgery. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2020;5. doi: 10.21037/ales.2019.12.01.
12. Kavalukas SL, Ghuman A, Sharp SP, et al. Robotic or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer—which is the best answer? a comprehensive review of non-oncological outcomes and learning curve. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:61.
13. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al. S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2011;25:240–248.
14. D'Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47: 2162–2168.
15. Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, et al. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56:458–466.
16. Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 2013;27:1379–1385.
17. Shin JY. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between a robotic colectomy and a laparoscopic colectomy during early experience. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2012;28:19–26.
18. Bertani E, Chiappa A, Biffi R, et al. Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-life short-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011;26:1317–1327.
19. Feinberg AE, Elnahas A, Bashir S, et al. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal resections with respect to 30-day perioperative morbidity. Can J Surg 2016;59:262–267.
20. Bhama AR, Obias V, Welch KB, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Surg Endosc 2016;30:1576–1584.
21. Lorenzon L, Bini F, Balducci G, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted colectomy and rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016;31:161–173.
22. Ma S, Chen Y, Guo T, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2019;42:589–598.
23. Sawada H, Egi H, Hattori M, et al. Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study. World J Surg Oncol 2015;13:103.
24. Nolan HR, Smith BE, Honaker MD. Operative time and length of stay is similar between robotic assisted and laparoscopic colon and rectal resections. J Robot Surg 2018;12:659–664.