Original Article

Fluids and Nutrition: Perspectives from Jewish Law (Halachah)

Authors: Fred Rosner MD, MACP, Neil Abramson MD, FACP

Abstract

Purpose:The use of nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill had been considered normal supportive measures until recently. Currently, many institutions, health care personnel and family members hold that nutrition and hydration are extraordinary measures that may be terminated.Methods:A case is offered to discuss the ruling by traditional Jewish law (Halachah) on the issue of nutrition and hydration.Results:Judaism upholds the supreme sanctity of human life. Fluids and nutrition are considered as ordinary supportive measures rather than heroic.Conclusion:Withholding of fluids and nutrition is inconsistent with Jewish law. These modalities are neither withheld nor withdrawn on the patient with the brain tumor, dementia, and previous wishes not to be kept alive with machines.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

References1. Rosner F. Death by withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Einstein J Biol Med 2003;20:81–84.RosnerFDeath by withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.Einstein J Biol Med20032081-842. Bleich JD. Bioethical Dilemmas. A Jewish Perspective. Hoboken, NJ, KTAV Publishing home, 1998.BleichJDBioethical Dilemmas. A Jewish Perspective.Hoboken, NJKTAV Publishing home19983. Barilan YM. [The terminal patient: Jewish religious law, the Steinberg report and the bioethical discourse in Israel]. Harefuah 2003;142:558–562, 564.BarilanYM[The terminal patient: Jewish religious law, the Steinberg report and the bioethical discourse in Israel].Harefuah2003142558-562, 5644. Abramson N. Quality of life: who can make the judgment? Am J Med 1996;100:365–366.AbramsonNQuality of life: who can make the judgment?Am J Med1996100365-3665. Frankl VE. Man's Search for Meaning. Boston, MA, Beacon Press, 1959.FranklVEMan's Search for Meaning.Boston, MABeacon Press19596. Barilan YM. Revisiting the problem of Jewish bioethics: the case of terminal care. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2003;13:141–168.BarilanYMRevisiting the problem of Jewish bioethics: the case of terminal care.Kennedy Inst Ethics J200313141-168