Background: Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is useful in identifying patients who may respond to lumbar facet injections. There are two methods for performing lumbar facet joint injections: intraarticular and medial branch nerve blocks. A consensus has yet to be reached among physicians as to which method is the most effective. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of intraarticular and medial branch nerve blocks in SPECT-positive lumbar facet joint patients with nonradicular lower back pain.
Method: This study was a prospective, double-blinded outcome study of 12 weeks’ duration. Forty-six male (26) and female patients (20) between the ages of 18 and 55 (mean 39.3 years) with nonradicular lower back pain who were lumbar facet joint SPECT-positive were studied. No patient was included in this study if magnetic resonance imaging evidence of a lumbar disc herniation was present. Patients were randomly assigned by computer to have intraarticular (group I) or medial branch nerve blocks (group II) with lidocaine and triamcinolone, with 23 patients in each group. Outcome measurements assessed the Numeric Pain Intensity Scores (NPIS 0–10) and the Oswestry Disability Index scores (ODI 0–50).
Results: There were no differences in demographics between the two groups. The percentage of pain relief (61%) and the percentage of disability (53%) reduction were significantly greater (P <0.05) in group I when compared to group II (26% and 31% respectively).
Conclusions: Intraarticular lumbar facet joint injections are more effective than medial branch nerve blocks in SPECT-positive patients.
* SPECT imaging may identify facet joint inflammation.
* Intraarticular facet joints are significantly effective in SPECT-positive patients.
* Median branch nerve blocks are not significantly effective in SPECT-positive patients.
1. Cohen SP, Raja SN. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain. Anesthesiology 2007;106:591–614.
2. Chung CT, Wang CF, Chou CS, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for low back pain induced by extension with no root sign. J Chin Med Assoc 2004;67:349–354.
3. Dolan AL, Ryan PJ, Arden NK, et al. The value of SPECT scans in identifying back pain likely to benefit from facet joint injection. Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:1269–1273.
4. Hanly JG, Barnes DC, Mitchell MJ, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography in the diagnosis of inflammatory spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol 1993;20:2062–2068.
5. Holder LE, Machin JL, Asdourian PL, et al. Planar and high-resolution SPECT bone imaging in the diagnosis of facet syndrome. J Nucl Med 1995;36:37–44.
6. Kim KY, Wang MY. Magnetic resonance image-based morphological predictors of single photon emission computed tomography-positive facet arthropathy in patients with axial back pain. Neurosurgery 2006;59:147–156; discussion 147–156.
7. McDonald M, Cooper R, Wang MY. Use of computed tomography-single-photon emission computed tomography fusion for diagnosing painful facet arthropathy. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus 2007;22:E2.
8. Pneumaticos SG, Chatziioannou SN, Hipp JA, et al. Low back pain: prediction of short-term outcome of facet joint injection with bone scintigraphy. Radiology 2006;238:693–698.
9. Ryan PJ, Evans P, Gibson T, et al. Osteoporosis and chronic back pain: a study with single-photon emission computed tomography bone scintigraphy. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:1455–1460.
10. Boswell MV, Colson JD, Spillane WF. Therapeutic facet joint interventions in chronic spinal pain: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain Physician 2005;8:101–114.
11. Bogduk N. A narrative review of intra-articular corticosteroid injections for low back pain. Pain Med 2005;6:287–296.
12. Manchikanti L. Facet joint pain and the role of neural blockade in its management. Curr Rev Pain 1999;3:348–358.
13. Stallmeyer MJ, Ortiz AO. Facet blocks and sacroiliac joint injections. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;5:201–206.
14. Marks RC, Houston T, Thulbourne T. Facet joint injection and facet nerve block: a randomised comparison in 86 patients with chronic low back pain. Pain 1992;49:325–328.
15. Hildebrandt J. Relevance of nerve blocks in treating and diagnosing low back pain–is the quality decisive?. Schmerz 2001;15:474–483.
16. Boswell MV, Colson JD, Sehgal N, et al. A systematic review of therapeutic facet joint interventions in chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007;10:229–253.
17. Manchikanti L, Manchikanti KN, Manchukonda R, et al. Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the management of chronic low back pain: preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: clinical trial NCT00355914. Pain Physician 2007;10:425–440.
18. Paris SV. Anatomy as related to function and pain. Orthop Clin North Am 1983;14:475–489.
19. Jerosch J, Castro WH, Liljenqvist U. Percutaneous facet coagulation: indication, technique, results, and complications. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1996;7:119–134.
20. Tan AL, Keen HI, Emery P, et al. Imaging inflamed synovial joints. Methods Mol Med 2007;135:3–26.
21. af Klint E, Grundtman C, Engstrom M, et al. Intraarticular glucocorticoid treatment reduces inflammation in synovial cell infiltrations more efficiently than in synovial blood vessels. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3880–3889.
22. Cavanaugh JM, Lu Y, Chen C, et al. Pain generation in lumbar and cervical facet joints. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(Suppl 2):63–67.
23. Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Fellows B, et al. The diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with or without adjuvant agents. Curr Rev Pain 2000;4:337–444.