Original Article

Poor Health, but Not Fracture and Fall Risk, Is Associated with Nonattendance at Bone Mineral Density Screening

Authors: Kathryn M. Ryder, MD, MS, Andrew Bush, PhD, Catherine Womack, MD, Wayne Pitts, PhD

Abstract

Background: Bone mineral density screening identifies women at risk for fracture. Nonattendance at screening is associated with subsequent hip fracture. Determining reasons for nonattendance may help in the designing of methods to improve screening.


Methods: We hypothesize that nonattenders may report poorer health and have a higher risk of fracture and fall. Women were randomly chosen from a list of people scheduled for a screening dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. We used a validated telephone survey to calculate osteoporosis, fracture, and fall risk scores. Women answered questions about their health and medical conditions.


Results: Of 263 women contacted, 226 (86%) women agreed to participate; 145 participants completed a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan and 81 women failed to attend. Women who did not attend screening were more likely to report a serious medical condition (59.3% vs 46.9%; P = 0.09). Nonattenders were more likely to report their health as fair or poor (51.9% vs 33.8%; P = 0.01). There were no differences for osteoporosis, fall, and fracture risks.


Conclusions: Failure to attend osteoporosis screening is associated with significant health problems and poor self-rated health. Improving point of care access may increase the amount of osteoporosis screening among women with multiple comorbidities.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Kern LM, Powe NR, Levine MA, et al. Association between screening for osteoporosis and the incidence of hip fracture. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 173–181.
 
2. Feldstein AC, Nichols GA, Elmer PJ, et al. Older women with fractures: patients falling through the cracks of guideline-recommended osteoporosis screening and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 2294–2302.
 
3. Redelmeier DA, Tan SH, Booth GL. The treatment of unrelated disorders inpatients with chronic medical diseases. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1516–1520.
 
4. McLean RR, Hannan MT, Epstein BE, et al. Elderly cohort study subjects unable to return for follow-up have lower bone mass than those who can return. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 151: 689–692.
 
5. Tinetti ME. Preventing falls in elderly persons. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 42–49.
 
6. Nelson HD, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 529–541.
 
7. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2010.
 
8. Ryder KM, Kessler LA, Jones CB, et al. A captive audience: a pilot study of screening and counseling hospitalized women for fracture risk. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 22: 830–834.
 
9. Solomon DH, Brookhart MA, Gandhi TK, et al. Adherence with osteoporosis practice guidelines: a multilevel analysis of patients, physician, and practice setting characteristics. Am J Med 2004; 117: 919–924.
 
10. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM, et al. Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. JAMA 2001; 286: 57–63.
 
11. Taylor BC, Schreiner PJ, Stone KL, et al. Long-term prediction of incident hip fracture risk in elderly white women: Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52: 1479–1486.
 
12. Nandy S, Parsons S, Cryer C, et al. Development and preliminary examination of the predictive validity of the Falls Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT) for use in primary care. J Public Health 2004; 26: 138–143.
 
13. Strawbridge WJ, Wallhagen MI. Self-rated health and mortality over three decades: results from a time-dependent covariate analysis. Res Aging 1999; 21: 402–416.
 
14. Buist DSM, LaCroix AZ, Brenneman SK, et al. A population-based osteoporosis screening program: who does not participate, and what are the onsequences? J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52: 1130–1137.
 
15. Mossey JM, Shapiro E. Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health 1982; 72: 800–808.
 
16. Lagerlund M, Sparen P, Thurfjell E, et al. Predictors of non-attendance in a population-based mammography screening programme; socio-demographic factors and aspects of health behaviour. Eur J Cancer Prev 2000; 9: 25–33.
 
17. Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Hall I, et al. Preventing chronic disease: nonadherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: what are the linkages to chronic disease risk?www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/jan/03_0015.htm. Accessed April 13, 2010.
 
18. Miller RG, Ashar BH, Cohen J, et al. Disparities in osteoporosis screening between at-risk African-American and white women. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 847–851.
 
19. Trimble CL, Richards LA, Wilgus-Wegweiser B, et al. Effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in an inpatient hospital setting. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 310–316.
 
20. Mandelblatt J, Freeman H, Winczewski D, et al. The costs and effects of cervical and breast cancer screening in a public hospital emergency room. The Cancer Control Center of Harlem. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 1182–1189.
 
21. Margolis KL, Lurie N, McGovern PG, et al. Increasing breast and cervical cancer screening in low-income women. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13: 515–521.