Original Article

Predictors of Failed Primary Abdominal Closure in the Trauma Patient with an Open Abdomen

Authors: Evan W. Beale, MD, Jeffrey E. Janis, MD, Joseph P. Minei, MD, Alan C. Elliott, MAS, MBA, Herb A. Phelan, MD, MSCS

Abstract

Background: We sought to characterize risk factors for failed closure after damage-control laparotomy and to examine the impact of two broad categories of open abdomen–management technique on rates of fascial approximation.


Methods: We retrospectively reviewed (January 2006–December 2008) all trauma patients with an open abdomen after damage-control laparotomy. Patients with definitive abdominal closure before discharge were classified as successful closure (SC) and those discharged with a planned ventral hernia were classified as failed closure (FC). Univariate stepwise logistical analyses were conducted to identify covariates related to resuscitation volumes and injury severity that were associated with FC. Surgical techniques were dichotomized as fascial based or vacuum based and compared with chi square.


Results: Sixty-two subjects met final eligibility (SC 44, FC 18). SC and FC were similar, with the exception of, respectively, initial base excess (−8.0 ± 4.2 vs −11.4 ± 4.9; P = 0.009), injury severity score (ISS; 29.0 ± 15.2 vs 20.6 ± 12.1; P = 0.04), and frequency of penetrating injury (47.7% vs 77.8%; P = 0.03). Stepwise regression showed significant associations between failed closure and increasing Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.11), worsening base excess on arrival (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.93), and lower ISS (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89–1.00). Fascial-based versus vacuum-based management techniques had no effect on closure rates.


Conclusions: Volume of blood transfused, crystalloid given, and open abdomen management technique were not related to closure rates; however, worsened base excess on arrival, penetrating trauma, higher Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index, and a lower ISS were associated with FC. The latter was true despite an association also being found between FC and lower ISS scores, reflecting the propensity of ISS to underestimate injury burden after penetrating injury.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, et al. “Damage control”: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma 1993; 35: 375–382.
 
2. Finlay IG, Edwards TJ, Lambert AW. Damage control laparotomy. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 83–85.
 
3. Cheatham ML, Safcsak K, Llerena LE, et al. Long-term physical, mental, and functional consequences of abdominal decompression. J Trauma 2004; 56: 237–241.
 
4. Montalvo JA, Acosta JA, Rodriguez P, et al. Surgical complications and causes of death in trauma patients that require temporary abdominal closure. Am Surg 2005; 71: 219–224.
 
5. Moore EE, Dunn EL, Moore JB, et al. Penetrating abdominal trauma index. J Trauma 1981; 21: 439–445.
 
6. Cayton CG, Stahl WM, Agarwal N, et al. Analyses of preventable deaths by mechanism of injury among 13,500 trauma admissions. Ann Surg 1991; 214: 510–520.
 
7. Acosta JA, Yang JC, Winchell RJ, et al. Lethal injuries and death in level I trauma center. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 528–533.
 
8. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE, et al. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma1995; 38: 185–193.
 
9. Schreiber MA, Perkins J, Kiraly L, et al. Early predictors of massive transfusion in combat casualties. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205: 541–545.
 
10. Rowell SE, Barbosa RR, Diggs BS, et al. Effect of high product ratio massive transfusion on mortality in blunt and penetrating trauma patients. J Trauma 2011; 71: S353–S357.
 
11. Nunez TC, Voskresensky IV, Dossett LA, et al. Early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: simple as ABC (assessment of blood consumption)? J Trauma 2009; 66: 346–352.
 
12. Cotton BA, Dossett LA, Haut ER, et al. Multicenter validation of the simplified score to predict massive transfussion in trauma. J Trauma 2010; 69: S33–S39.
 
13. Diaz JJ, Cullinane DC, Dutton WD, et al. The management of the open abdomen in trauma and emergency general surgery: part 1—damage control. J Trauma 2010; 68: 1425–1438.
 
14. Bee TK, Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, et al. Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J Trauma 2008; 65: 337–344.
 
15. Teixeira PGR, Salim A, Inaba K, et al. A prospective look at the current state of open abdomens. Am Surg 2008; 74: 891–897.
 
16. Stone PA, Hass SM, Flaherty BS, et al. Vacuum-assisted fascial closure for patients with abdominal trauma. J Trauma 2004; 57: 1082–1086.
 
17. Tieu BH, Cho D, Luem N, et al. The use of the Wittmann Patch facilitates a high rate of fascial closure in severely injured trauma patients and critically ill emergency surgery patients. J Trauma 2008; 65: 865–870.
 
18. Weinberg JA, George RL, Griffin RL, et al. Closing the open abdomen: improved success with Wittman Patch staged abdominal closure. J Trauma 2008; 65: 345–348.
 
19. Snyder CW, Weinberg JA, McGwin G, et al. The relationship of blood product ratio to mortality: survival benefit or survival bias? J Trauma 2009; 66: 358–364.
 
20. Holcomb JB, Wade CE, Michalek JE, et al. Increased plasma and platelet to red blood cell ratios improves outcome in 466 massively transfused civilian trauma patients. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 447–458.
 
21. Zink KA, Sambasivan CN, Holcomb JB, et al. A high ratio of plasma and platelets to packed red blood cells in the first 6 hours of massive transfusion improves outcomes in a large multicenter study.Am J Surg 2009; 197: 565–570.