Letter to the Editor
Response to Dr. Powell's Comments Regarding Our Manuscript Entitled: “Determining Functional Significance of Subclavian Artery Stenosis Using Exercise Thallium-201 Stress Imaging.”
Abstract
We appreciate the careful reading and comments from Dr. Powell. We would like to clarify a few points which are essential to the understanding of the significance of this paper.This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($15)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1.Wilson RF, Marcus ML, White CW. Prediction of the physiologic significance of coronary arterial lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited coronary artery disease. Circulation1987;75:723–732.
2.Zijlstra F, Van Ommeren J, Reiber JH, et al. Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis? Circulation 1987;75:1154–1161.
3.White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 1984;310:819–824.
4.Wilson RF, Marcus ML, Christensen BV, et al. Accuracy of exercise electrocardiography in detecting physiologically significant coronary arterial lesions. Circulation 1991;83: 412–421.
5.Lesser JL, Wilson RF, White CW. Physiologic assessment of coronary stenoses of intermediate severity can facilitate patient selection for coronary angioplasty. J Coronary Artery Dis 1990;1:697–705.
