Original Article

Rural-Urban Differences in HIV Viral Loads and Progression to AIDS among New HIV Cases

Authors: Sharon Weissman, MD, Wayne A. Duffus, MD, PhD, Medha Iyer, MD, PhD, Hrishikesh Chakraborty, DrPH, Ashok Varma Samantapudi, MSPH, Helmut Albrecht, MD

Abstract

Objective: The human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) epidemic in the United States has shifted to the South, where an increasing proportion is occurring in rural areas. We sought to gain a better understanding of the affected rural population in this region.

Methods: The statewide HIV/AIDS Electronic Reporting System database was used to examine the epidemiological characteristics of newly diagnosed HIV cases in South Carolina from 2005 to 2011. Rural–urban differences were examined in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including progression to AIDS and a decline in HIV viral load (VL) to undetectable levels within 1 year of diagnosis.

Results: Of the 5336 individuals newly diagnosed as having HIV, 1433 (26.9%) were from rural areas. Compared with urban residents, a higher proportion of rural residents were black, non-Hispanic (80.1% vs 68.5%; P ≤ 0.0001) and reported heterosexual risk (28.8% vs 22.9%; P = 0.0007). The proportion of female patients was higher in rural areas (29.7% vs 26.4%; P = 0.016). No significant rural–urban differences were found in initial CD4 + T-cell and VL counts or proportion obtaining an undetectable VL at 1 year. Rural residents were significantly more likely than urban residents to have AIDS at diagnosis or within 1 year of the HIV diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.007–1.326).

Conclusions: The reasons behind differences in proportions of rural and urban residents who were diagnosed as having AIDS or progressed to AIDS despite similar initial CD4 + T-cell counts and VL suppression at 1 year are unclear and should be explored in future studies. Future prevention and treatment efforts may need to consider the unique characteristics of rural populations in the South.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first.

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view your purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($15)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Reif SS, Whetten K, Wilson ER, et al. HIV/AIDS in the southern USA: a disproportionate epidemic. AIDS Care 2014;26:351-359.
 
2. Reif S, Golin CE, Smith SR. Barriers to accessing HIV/AIDS care in North Carolina: rural and urban differences. AIDS Care 2005;17:55865.
 
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and AIDS in the United States by geographic Distribution. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/geographic.htm. Accessed March 25, 2014.
 
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance in urban and nonurban areas. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/slides/urban-nonurban/index.htm. Accessed March 25, 2014.
 
5. Reif S, Geonnotti KL, Whetten K. HIV Infection and AIDS in the deep south. Am J Public Health 2006;96:970-973.
 
6. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. South Carolina’s HIV/AIDS Data: Surveillance Report December 31, 2012. http://www.scdhec.gov/health/disease/sts/docs/SurveillanceReport_2012.pdf. Accessed March 25, 2014.
 
7. Vyavaharkar M, Glover S, Leonhirth D, et al. HIV/AIDS in rural America: prevalence and service availability. http://rhr.sph.sc.edu/report/(11Y1)HIV%20AIDS%20in%20Rural%20America.pdf. AccessedMarch 25, 2014.
 
8. Hanna DB, Selik RM, Tang T, et al. Disparities among US states in HIV-related mortality in persons with HIV infection, 2001-2007. AIDS 2012; 26:95-103.
 
9. Ohl ME, Perencevich E. Frequency of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in urban vs. rural areas of the United States: results from a nationally-representative sample. BMC Public Health 2011;11:681.
 
10. Weis KE, Liese AD, Hussey J, et al. Associations of rural residence with timing of HIV diagnosis and stage of disease at diagnosis, South Carolina 2001-2005. J Rural Health 2010;26:105-112.
 
11. Ohl M, Tate J, Duggal M, et al. Rural residence is associated with delayed care entry and increased mortality among veterans with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Med Care 2010;48:1064-1070.
 
12. Cohn SE, Berk ML, Berry SH, et al. The care of HIV-infected adults in rural areas of the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2001;28:385-392.
 
13. Ohl M, Lund B, Belperio P, et al. SRural residence and adoption of a novel HIV therapy in a national, equal-access healthcare system. AIDS Behav 2013;17:250-259.
 
14. Lahey T, Lin M, Marsh B, et al. Increased mortality in rural patients with HIV in New England. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2007;23:693-698.
 
15. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006;55(RR-14):1-17.
 
16. 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR Recomm Rep 1992;41(RR-17):1-19.
 
17. Schneider E, Whitmore S, Glynn KM, et al. Revised surveillance case definitions for HIV infection among adults, adolescents, and children aged <18 months and for HIV infection and AIDS among children aged 18 months to <13 years--United States, 2008. MMWR Recomm Rep 2008;57(RR-10):1-12.
 
18. WWAMI Rural Health Research Center. ZIP code RUCA approximation. http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-approx.php. Accessed March 25, 2014.
 
19. WWAMI Rural Health Research Center. RUCA data. Version 2.0. http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-data.php. Accessed March 25, 2014.
 
20. US Census Bureau. State and county quickfacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html. Accessed March 25, 2014.
 
21. US Census Bureau. State and county quickfacts. South Carolina. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/45000.html. Accessed November 11, 2013.
 
22. Lemly DC, Shepherd BE, Hulgan T, et al. Race and sex differences in antiretroviral therapy use and mortality among HIV-infected persons in care. J Infect Dis 2009;199:991-998.
 
23. Hirschhorn LR, McInnes K, Landon BE, et al. Gender differences in quality of HIV care in Ryan White CARE Act-funded clinics. Women’s Health Issues 2006;16:104-112.
 
24. Fleishman JA, Yehia BR, Moore RD, et al. Disparities in receipt of antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected adults (2002-2008). Med Care 2012;50:419-427.
 
25. Losina E, Schackman BR, Sadownik SN, et al. Racial and sex disparities in life expectancy losses among HIV-infected persons in the united states: impact of risk behavior, late initiation, and early discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:1570-1578.
 
26. Meditz AL, MaWhinney S, Allshouse A, et al. Sex, race, and geographic region influence clinical outcomes following primary HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis 2011;203:442-451.
 
27. Hall HI, Tang T, Westfall AO, et al. HIV care visits and time to viral suppression, 19 U.S. jurisdictions, and implications for treatment, prevention and the national HIV/AIDS strategy. PLoS One 2013;8:e84318.
 
28. Hanna DB, Buchacz K, Gebo KA, et al. Trends and disparities in antiretroviral therapy initiation and virologic suppression among newly treatment-eligible HIV-infected individuals in North America, 2001-2009. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56:1174-1182.
 
29. Weis KE, Liese AD, Hussey J, et al. A routine HIV screening program in a South Carolina community health center in an area of low HIV prevalence. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2009;23:251-258.
 
30. Onyeajam DJ, Eke R, Stephens TG, et al. Time to linkage to care and viro-immunologic parameters of individuals diagnosed before and after the 2006 HIV testing recommendations. South Med J 2013;106:257-266.
 
31. HHS Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents--a working group of the Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council (OARAC). Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines/html/1/adult-and-adolescent-arv-guidelines/0. Accessed March 25, 2014.
 
32. Higa DH, Marks G, Crepaz N, et al. Interventions to improve retention in HIV primary care: a systematic review of U.S. studies. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2012;9:313-325.
 
33. Ogbuanu IU, Torres ME, Kettinger L, et al. Epidemiological characterization of individuals with newly reported HIV infection: South Carolina, 2004-2005. Am J Public Health 2009;99(Suppl 1):S111-S117.
 
34. Vyavaharkar M, Moneyham L, Murdaugh C, et al. Factors associated with quality of life among rural women with HIV disease. AIDS Behav 2012;16:295-303.
 
35. Sutton M, Anthony MN, Vila C, et al. HIV testing and HIV/AIDS treatment services in rural counties in 10 southern states: service provider perspectives. J Rural Health 2010;26:240-247.
 
36. Pellowski JA. Barriers to care for rural people living with HIV: a review of domestic research and health care models. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2013;24:422-437.
 
37. Tripathi A, Gardner LI, Ogbuanu I, et al. Predictors of time to enter medical care after a new HIV diagnosis: a statewide population-based study. AIDS Care 2011;23:1366-1373.
 
38. US Department of Agriculture. Rural classifications. What is rural? http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/rural-economy-population/rural-classifications/what-is-rural.aspx. Accessed March 25, 2014.
 
39. Agee BS, Funkhouser E, Roseman JM, et al. Migration patterns following HIV diagnosis among adults residing in the nonurban Deep South. AIDS Care 2006;18(Suppl 1):S51-S58.
 
40. Lansky A, Nakashima AK, Diaz T, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus infection in rural areas and small cities of the southeast: contributions of migration and behavior. J Rural Health 2000;16:20-30.