1. Snyder SH. Biological Aspects of Mental Disorders. New York, Oxford University Press, 1980.
2. Bufe C. Alcoholics Anonymous: Cult or Cure? San Francisco, Sharp Press, 1998.
3. McCrady BS, Miller WR (ed). Research on Alcoholics Anonymous: Opportunities and Alternatives. Piscataway, Rutgers Center for Alcohol Studie, 1993.
4. Humphreys K, Huebsch PD, Finney JW, et al. A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: V. Substance abuse treatment can enhance the effectiveness of self-help groups. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999;23:558–563.
5. Timko C, Moos RH, Finney JW, et al. Long-term outcomes of alcohol use disorders: comparing untreated individuals with those in alcoholics anonymous and formal treatment. J Stud Alcohol 2000;61:529–540.
6. Emrick CD, Tonigan JS, Montgomery HA, Little L. Alcoholics Anonymous: What is currently know? In: McCrady BS, Miller WR, (ed). Research on Alcoholics Anonymous: Opportunities and Alternatives. New Brunswick, Rutgers Center on Alcohol Studies, 1993, pp 41–76.
7. Tonigan JS, Hiller-Sturmhofel S. Alcoholics Anonymous: Who benefits? Alcohol Health and Research World 1994;18:303–310.
8. Tonigan JS. Benefits of Alcoholics Anonymous attendance: Replication of findings between clinical research sites in Project MATCH. Alcohol Treat Q 2001;19:67–78.
9. Winzelberg A, Humphreys K. Should patients’ religiosity influence clinicians’ referral to 12-step self-help groups? Evidence from a study of 3,018 male substance abuse patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999;67:790–794.
10. Tonigan JS, Miller WR, Schermer C. Atheists, agnostics and Alcoholics Anonymous. J Stud Alcohol 2002;63:534–541.
11. Montgomery HA, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Differences among AA groups: implications for research. J Stud Alcohol 1993;54:502–504.
12. Tonigan JS, Ashcroft F, Miller WR. AA group dynamics and 12-step activity. J Stud Alcohol1995;56:616–621.
13. Horstmann MJ, Tonigan JS. Faith development in Alcoholics Anonymous: A study of two AA groups. Alcohol Treat Q 2000;18:75–84.
14. Rascon C, Tonigan JS. A comparison of Narcotics Anonymous and Alcoholics Anonymous member perceptions of group dynamics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2003;26(Suppl 5):648A (Abstract).
15. Tonigan JS, Carroll RL, Miller WR. AA group differences: Adoption of prescribed practices and beliefs. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004;28(Suppl):136. (Abstract).
16. Tonigan JS, Toscova R. 12-step migration: A comparison of member characteristics and practices. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005;29(Suppl):385. (Abstract).
17. Connors GJ, Tonigan JS, Miller WR. Religiosity and responsiveness to alcoholism treatments: Matching findings and causal chain analyses. In Longabaugh RH, Wirth PW (Ed), Project MATCH: A priori Matching Hypotheses, Results and Mediating Mechanisms. Rockville, US Government Printing Office, 2001.
18. Humphreys K, Kaskutas LA, Weisner C. The Alcoholics Anonymous Affiliation Scale: development, reliability, and norms for diverse treated and untreated populations. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998;22:974–978.
19. Tonigan JS, Miller WR, Connors GJ. Meaning-seeking and treatment outcome: Matching findings and causal chain analyses. In Longabaugh RH, Wirth PW (Ed), Project MATCH: A priori Matching Hypotheses, Results and Mediating Mechanisms. Rockville, US Government Printing Office, 2001.
20. Montgomery HA, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Does Alcoholics Anonymous involvement predict treatment outcome? J Subst Abuse Treat 1995;12:241–246.
21. Tonigan JS. Spirituality and AA Practices Three and Ten Years After Project MATCH. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2003;26 (Suppl):660A. (Abstract).
22. Pargament KI, Kendall J, Hathaway W, et al. Religion and the problems solving process: Three style of coping. J Sci Study Relig 1988;27:90–104.